Teams

Busch 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLiz Busch / Lyndsey Grubb vs Ginger Ballard / Tammy Milani0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Barnes / Kathleen Mooney vs Catherine Johnstone / Corinne Kendall6-4, 7-6
2026-08-26vs Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Rusiewicz / Caroline Wilson vs Tina Dixon / Cassandra Thompson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathleen Mooney / Leslie Patterson vs Bridget Cornwall / Jennifer Page6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Barnes / Liz Busch vs Jennifer Nall / Lisa Simmons3-6, 4-6
2026-08-12vs GRETA 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMLost 02
L#2 DoublesSpring Walsh / Leslie Patterson vs Ashleigh Corthum / Brittney Obrien2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Olalere / Lyndsey Grubb vs Christi Womble / Heather Barber1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kathleen Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Tara Rusiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Liz Busch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Evie Curley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Angela Olalere
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Leslie Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Lyndsey Grubb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Spring Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Busch + Tara Rusiewicz7652% games+8.4% vs expected
Liz Busch + Evie Curley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Mooney
29W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Tara Rusiewicz
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Liz Busch
22W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Evie Curley
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Angela Olalere
10W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Leslie Patterson
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Lyndsey Grubb
4W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Spring Walsh
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.