Teams

McKeown/Nashville

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Mixed - Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-03vs Bates/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesKlaire Davis / Ryan Hitt vs Kaitlin Pickrel / Christopher Bates5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gilmore / Randy Kerr vs Thashia Garcia / Mateus Fairbairn4-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs Bates/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Hitt / Klaire Davis vs Christopher Bates / Thashia Garcia2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Kerr / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO vs Lindsey Vaughan / Kory Craighead0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesIgor Shalkevich / Sarah Green vs Charlie Sevier / JESSICA ARNOLD2-6, 6-7
2026-06-15vs Strong/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKlaire Davis / Ryan Hitt vs Kristen Young / Jake Ward6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIgor Shalkevich / Sarah Green vs Tyler Strong / Hayly Schmidt6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO / Mark Sargent vs Bradley Ternes / Elle Ternes3-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs Bates/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSean Hughes / Sarah Green vs Christopher Bates / MacKenzie Phillips3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO / Randy Kerr vs Kory Craighead / Brittney Covington5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael McKeown / Heather Craig vs Lindsey Vaughan / Jacob Parrish3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Mixed - Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bates/Nashville50141274
2McKeown/Nashville1321020139
3Strong/Nashville031816102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Amy Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Ryan Hitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Michael McKeown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Randy Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Igor Shalkevich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.94
Sean Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Mark Sargent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Klaire Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Hitt + Klaire Davis3448% gamesnot enough data
Amy Gilmore + Michael McKeown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Gilmore
39W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.51
Ryan Hitt
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Michael McKeown
20W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Randy Kerr
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Igor Shalkevich
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Sean Hughes
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.94
Mark Sargent
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.82
Klaire Davis
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.