Teams

CBaddour.18C-CHCC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.65 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Chapel Hill Country Club
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Chapel Hill Country Club
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Chapel Hill Country Club
2026-09-10vs MDaubert-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Shelby / Emily Kent vs Christa McGill / Amy Johnston6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarybeth Evers / Carey Baddour vs Sharon Huang / Laura Carlson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTina Cunningham / Megan Jones vs Susie Post-Rust / Diane Allen6-2, 6-3
2026-09-03vs TPerrone-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Cunningham / Deborah Howard vs Terry Perrone / Christine Hughes2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Shelby / Marybeth Evers vs Christin Daniels / Ashley McRae6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrances Wilson / Barbara Estay vs Jane Williams / Kelli Harris6-2, 6-1
2026-08-20vs SFranks.7.5C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Estay / Betsey Duthe vs Kim El / Katie Elder4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Jones / Emily Kent vs Sarah Franks / Laurie Straube3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeri A Clark / Rochelle Grieco vs Catherine Whitt / Hannah White6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Crissy Haley
published 4
3.93
Barbara Estay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Keri A Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Sarah Shelby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Carey Baddour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jamie Freedman
published 3.5
3.58
Betsey Duthe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Emily Kent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Tina Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Marybeth Evers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Frances Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Laurel Zdanski
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marybeth Evers + Sarah Shelby4450% games+2.3% vs expected
Crissy Haley + Barbara Estay9166% games+1.0% vs expected
Marybeth Evers + Carey Baddour41043% games−1.1% vs expected
Carey Baddour + Crissy Haley4456% games−2.1% vs expected
Carey Baddour + Sarah Shelby3446% games−2.5% vs expected
Carey Baddour + Keri A Clark1440% games−6.5% vs expected
Carey Baddour + Betsey Duthe5164% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Grieco + Carey Baddour3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crissy Haley
29W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Barbara Estay
89W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Keri A Clark
36W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Sarah Shelby
57W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Carey Baddour
239W–204L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Jamie Freedman
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Betsey Duthe
30W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Emily Kent
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–191L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Tina Cunningham
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Marybeth Evers
92W–118L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Frances Wilson
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Laurel Zdanski
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.