Teams

Lewis/DV/Foothills

2026 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 7.5 Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Helsper/HCP/Foothills ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Ann Lewis / Marie Shuford vs Nancy James / Kimberly Steele2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Graham / Tracy Taylor vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Megan Reid0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKimberly Church / Valerie Craig vs Kelly Miller / Kelly Walker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Tonks/PC/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Ann Lewis / Marie Shuford vs Sallie LaChance / Deirdre Bolter6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pillow / Carrie Caviness vs Sandra Reid / Ellen Stupka6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTracy Taylor / Hadley Watson vs Candace Scott / Kelly Emoff6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Hadley Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jennifer Pillow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Meghan Copley
published 4
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Kathleen Graham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Kimberly Church
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Carrie Caviness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jill Reese
published
3.08
Marie Shuford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Valerie Craig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Copley + Jennifer Pillow404 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Copley + Carrie Caviness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hadley Watson
30W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jennifer Pillow
79W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Meghan Copley
62W–45L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Kathleen Graham
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kimberly Church
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Carrie Caviness
37W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Jill Reese
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Marie Shuford
70W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Valerie Craig
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.