Teams

5 LPC Morgan

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-10vs 4 CCV PahujaLost 12
L#1 SinglesNicholas Arcaro vs Noah Greenbaum2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesShom Paul vs Rishi Pahuja6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesEmmit Wright vs Ryan Grammer1-6, 1-6
2025-11-06vs 6 Woodlake - ONeillSplit 11
W#1 SinglesWill Gauden vs Scott Alcorn6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRobert Meister vs Alfred Gamulo2-4
2025-10-22vs 13 Chestnut Oaks CoyleWon 21
W#1 SinglesWill Gauden vs Lucas Ward6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEmmit Wright vs Michael Coyle0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRobert Meister vs Marshall Powell6-4, 6-3
2025-10-15vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesShom Paul vs Reilly Maw1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNicholas Arcaro vs Ryan Frei6-3, 6-2
2025-10-14vs 2 Hermitage AdamsLost 02
L#1 SinglesShom Paul vs David Blankley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDouglas Morgan vs Samuel Adams1-6, 3-6
2025-10-08vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraLost 12
L#1 SinglesEmmit Wright vs Kyle Bagley2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNicholas Arcaro vs John Haggai6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDouglas Morgan vs Jay Pettit0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesWill Gauden vs Allen Sleeman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmmit Wright vs Malik Mathews7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRobert Meister vs Billy Walter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-24vs 3 ACAC NaputiLost 12
W#1 SinglesNicholas Arcaro vs Scott Rose3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRobert Meister vs Robert Peskind2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDouglas Morgan vs Bradford Rhodes3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Shom Paul
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Will Gauden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.03
Nicholas Arcaro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.55
Douglas Morgan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Emmit Wright
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Robert Meister
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shom Paul
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Will Gauden
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Nicholas Arcaro
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
2.5
Douglas Morgan
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Emmit Wright
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.34
Robert Meister
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.