Teams

Az.Bell18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Ma.Evans18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLatoya Clay / Rachel Kasongo vs Kathryn West / Jessica Oehlrich6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAzariah Bell vs Katie McLean6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVanessa Treires / Carol Ann Mcmillan vs Taylor Coburn / Arin Vaughan3-6, 2-6
2026-04-27vs El.Robinson18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Kasongo / Azariah Bell vs Emily Funderburk / Katie Landi6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Elizabeth Robinson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAyse Karanci / Vanessa Treires vs Shanah Black / Sara Perdue6-1, 6-1
2026-04-20vs Ja.Stephan18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Kasongo / Azariah Bell vs Hayes McCaffrey / Samantha Siano6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Leah Beatty6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAyse Karanci / Carol Ann Mcmillan vs Lindsay Singler / Rebekah Noulles1-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs Jo.Johnson18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLatoya Clay / Rachel Kasongo vs Katie Riley / Kate Schanz6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAzariah Bell vs Jocelyn Johnson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAyse Karanci / Vanessa Treires vs Anneliese Henrich / Torie Hanafin7-5, 6-1
2026-03-23vs Ka.Marotta18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Ann Mcmillan / Henriette Nshunguye vs Miriam Nuffer / Darrena Yehia7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Ashley Stephenson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Kasongo / Vanessa Treires vs Jennifer Bent / Connie Dimitroff6-0, 6-2
2026-03-16vs La.Hampton18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Kasongo / Kaitlin Tucker vs Lauren Hampton / Susan Potter2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Kelly Baltzer6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHenriette Nshunguye / Ayse Karanci vs Michelle Mueller / Christine Conti4-6, 2-6
2026-03-09vs Ma.Evans18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Ann Mcmillan / Vanessa Treires vs Kathryn West / Mary Evans5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAzariah Bell vs Taylor Coburn6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaitlin Tucker / Rachel Kasongo vs Patricia Haver / Lisa Pakela6-2, 6-0
2026-03-02vs El.Robinson18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesVanessa Treires / Kaitlin Tucker vs Caryn McNeill / Greyson McGrail3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAyse Karanci vs Emily Funderburk1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAzariah Bell / Latoya Clay vs Katie Landi / Jenny Branch6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Hampton18A8020411125
2Ch.Wellman18A7017410131
3Ca.WilliamsAden18A6115615152
4Me.Frost18A6114717163
5La.Gentile18A6219512135
6Az.Bell18A6216816158
7Br.Robinson18A6216821200
8El.Robinson18A62141021167
9Co.Hicks18A2.55214715144
10Je.Tyndall18A5213818153
11Em.Boyer18A4313817156
12Te.Marcott18A43101123187
13Me.Dougher18A43111024192
14Ma.Harber18A43111024185
15Ja.Stephan18A44131123187
16Ke.Hurter18A3311716129
17Be.Pitt18A3412920161
18Da.Louzao18A3481327198
19Mo.Lewis18A35111329214
20Mo.Weimer18A35101431235
21Ka.Manooch18A2571428201
22Lo.Stevens18A2581329199
23Ra.Rosen18A2571432225
24Ma.Evans18A2691532234
25Jo.Johnson18A2691533237
26Am.Brandon18A2661836224
27Di.Harper18A1531530193
28Je.Glennon18A1661531214
29Ni.Thomas18A0741736227
30Ka.Marotta18A0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Latoya Clay
usually #2 Singles 31%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 2.5
2.65
Rachel Kasongo
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.61
Azariah Bell
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Vanessa Treires
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Ayse Karanci
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.35
Henriette Nshunguye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Kaitlin Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.03
Carol Ann Mcmillan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Natasha Wiley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Latoya Clay + Azariah Bell6167% games+9.5% vs expected
Azariah Bell + Rachel Kasongo12163% games+2.0% vs expected
Latoya Clay + Rachel Kasongo6161% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Latoya Clay
89W–62L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.84
2.5
Rachel Kasongo
35W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.65
2.5
Azariah Bell
68W–39L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Vanessa Treires
8W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Ayse Karanci
9W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Henriette Nshunguye
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Kaitlin Tucker
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Carol Ann Mcmillan
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Natasha Wiley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.