Teams

LCGR- Griffin 18+ 7.5 Jetton

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-13vs LVWE/WestportWon 21
L#1 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kathryn Burdick vs Brenda Levy / Patricia Ferguson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCortney Griffin / Kelly Hallman vs Becky Heflin / Coleen Foye7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Claudia Bareis vs Crystal Regan / Helen Bugg6-3, 6-0
2022-10-06vs LABonham/NMPWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Humphreys / Maggie Siebert vs Anna Bonham / Susan Lesso6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Leta Wiley vs Kelly Lesso / Michelle Murphy4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Kelly Hallman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-29vs TNestor/PACWon 30
W#1 DoublesOdette Baker / Stefanie Flippin vs Tracy Nestor / Marsha Wall6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Leta Wiley vs Kathy Buaron / Christine Nilson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Karen Dziadziola vs Suzanne Davis / Pamela Bender6-1, 6-2
2022-09-28vs LVWE/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Humphreys / Maggie Siebert vs Melinda Urban / Angela Stallman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Leta Wiley vs Brenda Levy / Coleen Foye7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Odette Baker vs Diane Davis / Nancy Miller5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-15vs LABonham/NMPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Samantha Humphreys vs Ellyn Pavelka / Anna Bonham6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCortney Griffin / Karen Dziadziola vs Jennifer Higgins / Cindy Japec3-6, 1-6
2022-09-08vs TNestor/PACWon 21
W#1 DoublesOdette Baker / Kelly Hallman vs Greigh Lucas / Shelby Graff7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandy McAlpine / Leta Wiley vs Pamela Bender / Tracy Nestor6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Heidi Nyquist vs Christine Nilson / Kathy Buaron2-6, 2-6
2022-09-01vs LVWE/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Humphreys / Stefanie Flippin vs Diane Davis / Brenda Levy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Odette Baker vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Denise Bost6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMaggie Siebert / Heidi Nyquist vs Coleen Foye / Becky Heflin1-6, 3-6
2022-08-25vs LABonham/NMPWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Stefanie Flippin vs Anna Bonham / Ellyn Pavelka7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaggie Siebert / Leta Wiley vs Jennifer Higgins / Cindy Japec6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Samantha Humphreys vs Robin Underwood / Cyndi Poell6-0, 6-1
2022-08-18vs TNestor/PACWon 20
W#2 DoublesOdette Baker / Kelly Hallman vs Christine Nilson / Becky Kumar6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kathryn Burdick vs Marsha Wall / Greigh Lucas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.85
Maggie Siebert
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Leta Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Odette Baker
published
3.57
Karen Dziadziola
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Michelle Skaggs
published
3.33
Cortney Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.29
Heidi Nyquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sandy McAlpine
published
3.07
Kathryn Burdick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Claudia Bareis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Hallman + Maggie Siebert9357% games+6.0% vs expected
Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+0.9% vs expected
Cortney Griffin + Kelly Hallman6455% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Cortney Griffin6160% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Maggie Siebert7064% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dziadziola + Cortney Griffin4254% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Siebert + Leta Wiley4157% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Burdick + Stefanie Flippin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Maggie Siebert
94W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Leta Wiley
181W–87L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Odette Baker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Karen Dziadziola
206W–143L career · 4 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Michelle Skaggs
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cortney Griffin
156W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
130W–151L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Sandy McAlpine
2W–24L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Kathryn Burdick
115W–162L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.