Teams

SD 3.5WE Peninsula TC/ Wilkinson

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE Women · SD- Women - WE 3.5 (SD

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-13vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ CorbittLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Gamara / Karen Axmann vs Celia Hernandez / Viviana Rozo1-6, 1-6
2022-02-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Burnes / Tracy Wilkinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Burnes / Shelly Patriquin vs Pamela Barnett / Leah Christensen6-1, 6-4
2022-02-13vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Blum / Alicia Burnes vs Ping Chen / Julie Islitzer1-6, 0-6
2022-02-06vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ CorbittWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Burnes / Lisa Mallory vs Brenda Villasenor / Celia Hernandez0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlicia Burnes / Karen Axmann vs Lisa Hunter / Irena Hukari2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women - WE 3.5 (SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kim Schwab
published 4
3.60
Patricia HOLMAN
published
3.52
Cherie Hibbs
published 4
3.28
Shelly Patriquin
published
3.21
Tracy Wilkinson
published
3.08
Alicia Burnes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.95
Lisa Serrano
published
2.63
Karen Axmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Schwab
90W–31L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Patricia HOLMAN
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Cherie Hibbs
63W–41L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Shelly Patriquin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Tracy Wilkinson
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Alicia Burnes
33W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
Lisa Serrano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.