Teams

Doubles Therapy

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-19vs Sweet ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Jo Specter / Amy Woodell vs DeeDee Green / Jennifer Frazier7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Schoenfeld / Chelsea Lowe vs Gina Budd / Emily Hayes4-6, 2-6
2026-06-12vs Net NinjasWon 20
W#1 SinglesRaquel Gorny vs Jennifer Gaskins6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLindsey Schoenfeld / Amy Woodell vs Amber Sue Huff / Kellie Wilson6-2, 6-3
2026-06-05vs Terminetters 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Shoen / Maryann Parris vs Amanda Atkinson / Bridget Yost1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLindsey Schoenfeld vs Sheila Cooper1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Rimoin / Raquel Gorny vs Catherine DeStasio / Lana Bernberg6-2, 6-0
2026-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesRaquel Gorny / Lauren Rimoin vs Jaye Wadlington / Stephanie Miller6-2, 6-2
2026-05-15vs ATX AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Gandy / Melissa Zinda vs Jennifer Leisure / Leslie Moore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-14vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Lapietra / Melissa Zinda vs Martha Coerver / Sezer Isuf5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRaquel Gorny / Amy Woodell vs Angela Broxterman / Evonne Gottsch5-7, 2-6
2026-04-17vs Racq PacqLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Shoen / Kelly Jo Specter vs Brianna Thrash / Kerri Westmoreland0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMelissa Zinda vs Carrie Morton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatherine Gallagher / Amy Woodell vs Megan Zaal / Laura Sykes4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Ladies 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sweet Shots4210817134
2Net Ninjas4210819161
3Terminetters 2.53311718152
4Racq Pacq3371125164
5Doubles Therapy2481022168
6Bagel Girls2481024163
7Backhanded Compliments000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Melissa Zinda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Amy Woodell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Melissa Lapietra
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Elaine Murray
published 2.5
2.24
Lindsey Schoenfeld
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.21
Raquel Gorny
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Katie Shoen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Maryann Parris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Gorny + Amy Woodell213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Lapietra + Lindsey Schoenfeld213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Schoenfeld + Maryann Parris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Zinda
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Amy Woodell
9W–6L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Melissa Lapietra
15W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Elaine Murray
15W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Schoenfeld
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Raquel Gorny
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Katie Shoen
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Maryann Parris
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.