Teams

KC-RH ORANGE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-04vs HRCA-N PINKWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer DHaenens / Lacey McMurry vs Tosha MacK / Tina Ruggiero6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-28vs FOX NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril McNamee / Lacey McMurry vs Kathleen Glenn / Jennifer Haar6-4, 7-5
2024-08-21vs HV NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Franzen / Jennifer DHaenens vs Stacy Beharry / Carrie Romine3-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs HF YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLacey McMurry vs Toni Beck4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesApril McNamee / Jennifer DHaenens vs Susan Davis / Jesse Margetson6-2, 6-1
2024-08-14vs HW GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesCandace Sturges / Lacey McMurry vs Jill Ellsworth / Haley Evans4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-24vs LEBTC TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesLacey McMurry / Karen Christensen vs LuAnn Wadman / Suzanne Termaat4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer DHaenens vs Deborah Cartwright3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Amy McFarland
published 3
2.79
Jennifer DHaenens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Brooke Wright
published 3
2.49
Candace Sturges
published 3
2.27
Lacey McMurry
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.26
Sacha Pfeifer
published
2.13
Sarah Franzen
published
2.13
April McNamee
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey McMurry + Jennifer DHaenens91743% games−1.1% vs expected
April McNamee + Sarah Franzen213 matchesnot enough data
April McNamee + Sacha Pfeifer213 matchesnot enough data
April McNamee + Jennifer DHaenens303 matchesnot enough data
Amy McFarland + Sacha Pfeifer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy McFarland
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Jennifer DHaenens
38W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Brooke Wright
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Candace Sturges
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Lacey McMurry
43W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Sacha Pfeifer
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.26
Sarah Franzen
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
April McNamee
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.