Teams

Farrington/Howard 18+ ES23

2023 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-12vs Johnson/Sebring 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Howard / Martha Long vs Victoria Maas / Kavitha Bharath6-1, 6-4
2022-12-05vs Overdahl 18+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Howard / Martha Long vs Lizzy Larson / Cate Dymit7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-07vs Landrus 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Howard / Lori Powell-Knutson vs Michele Fredrickson / Heather Landrus6-3, 6-0
2022-10-31vs Johnson/Sebring 18+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMartha Long / Pam Howard vs Kavitha Bharath / Ellen Spika6-4, 6-4
2022-10-17vs Ehle/Henke 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Howard / Pam Bowden vs Linda Bieza / Susan Bohlke7-5, 6-4
2022-10-03vs Landrus 18+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Howard / Martha Long vs Cynthia Betz / Kathy Sommers6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Martha Long
published
3.48
Pam Bowden
published
3.24
Elizabeth Shimota
published
3.21
Molly Lyons
published
3.18
Lori Powell-Knutson
published
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.08
Lisa Schurch
published
3.07
Annice Miller
published 3
2.82
Lorna Mah Lee
published
2.80
Laura Farrington
published
2.75
Ann Fort
published 3
Elizabeth Weiers
published
Heidi Kapacinskas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Farrington + Ann Fort113040% games+1.7% vs expected
Lisa Schurch + Elizabeth Shimota134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Long
51W–46L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Elizabeth Shimota
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Molly Lyons
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Lori Powell-Knutson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
Lisa Schurch
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Annice Miller
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lorna Mah Lee
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Laura Farrington
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Ann Fort
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
Elizabeth Weiers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heidi Kapacinskas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.