Teams

LTFC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-25vs EM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesStefanie Fishman / Andrea Starlin vs Beth Toth / Jennifer Welte2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNikki Vivion vs Sarah Warfield0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Blomquist / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Kesa Sullivan / Kelly Trotter0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Best / Goca Weis vs Brooke Bolinske / Hillary Cecil7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-18vs SS-H REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStefanie Fishman / Mary Brady vs Mary Morris / Julie King6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesYael Roush vs Susan Wist2-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesGoca Weis / Mimi Wong vs Jamie Vonfeldt / Debora Rewerts6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Best / Tamara Brown vs Alicia Thorne / Molly Groves0-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs KNO BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesStefanie Fishman / Mary Brady vs MaryLynn Thompson / Rebecca Fanning2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNikki Vivion vs Diane Klepacka2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK / Andrea Starlin vs Julie Madden / Meagan Schreiber6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSusan Best vs Danielle Gloege7-6, 7-5
2026-05-11vs HG REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesMary Brady / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Sarah Mesner / Kaitlin Bernhoerster3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNikki Vivion vs Heidi Custer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStefanie Fishman / Andrea Starlin vs Allison Rampley / Valerie Peterson3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesRebecca Blomquist vs Molly Svendsen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Best / Tamara Brown vs Abby Gilbertson / Kay Langman6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs HV SILVERLost 23
L#1 DoublesMary Brady / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Monica Reidelbach / Jean Mortellaro4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Blomquist vs Margo Ellis7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGoca Weis / Mimi Wong vs Danielle Kennedy / Leslie Moody3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStefanie Fishman vs Nancy Kelly5-2
L#3 DoublesNikki Vivion / Tamara Brown vs Anna Larsen / Rhonda Williamson1-6, 3-6
2026-04-20vs SS-D REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesMimi Wong / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Roberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNikki Vivion vs Soyon Bueno1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Brady / Susan Best vs Becki Jernigan / Susan Kim4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Starlin vs Sherri Rosselot6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRebecca Blomquist / Tamara Brown vs Kathy Hoskins / Susie Taylor2-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs HW BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesKATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK / Mary Brady vs Jill Schladetzky / Tisha Smith3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNikki Vivion vs Brooke Rebstock1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Fishman / Andrea Starlin vs Carina Clancy / Robin Earley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYael Roush vs Margaret Lee2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Best / Rebecca Blomquist vs Haley Evans / Evyan Maniatis6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Mimi Wong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Rebecca Blomquist
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.70
Goca Weis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Susan Best
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.63
Stefanie Fishman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Mary Brady
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.61
KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Andrea Starlin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.33
Tamara Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Nikki Vivion
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Yael Roush
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Starlin + Stefanie Fishman4254% games+3.4% vs expected
Mary Brady + KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK1540% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mimi Wong
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Rebecca Blomquist
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Goca Weis
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Susan Best
8W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Stefanie Fishman
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mary Brady
17W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK
12W–37L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Andrea Starlin
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Tamara Brown
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Nikki Vivion
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Yael Roush
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.