Teams

ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Laura Dommes
published
3.37
3.37
Kara Chizever
published
3.37
Michelle Bauer
published
3.33
Susie Hansen
published
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.17
Andrea Eubanks
published 3.5
3.14
Michaela Katari
published
3.12
Tori DeCoite
published
3.09
Mihaela Farnholtz
published
3.02
Mickie Kerr
published
2.94
Julie Takano-Peters
published
2.92
2.80
Kerry Maunus
published
2.74
Jamie Damaschino
published 3
2.74
2.70
Kathleen Dunlap
published
2.69
Kristi Carter
published
2.67
Shelly Cuny
published
2.65
Raylinn Bianchi
published
2.45
Michelle Stratmore
published
Julie Peloquin
published
Robin Azevedo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Dommes + Susie Hansen4159% gamesnot enough data
Mickie Kerr + Julie Takano-Peters224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Dommes
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kara Chizever
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Michelle Bauer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Andrea Eubanks
6W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Michaela Katari
46W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
Tori DeCoite
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
Mihaela Farnholtz
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
Julie Takano-Peters
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Andrea Bryan-Grout
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kerry Maunus
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Jamie Damaschino
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Danielle Cranston
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Kathleen Dunlap
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Kristi Carter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Shelly Cuny
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Raylinn Bianchi
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Michelle Stratmore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Azevedo
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.