Teams

KY/LEX/Yanik

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 2.5 Women (Session 2)

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2026-05-27vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 20
W#1 DoublesNiki Moss / Anna Marino vs Laura Moffett / Chenyi Qiu6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDezirae Shukla / Elizabeth Yanik vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks7-5, 6-4
2026-05-17vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 21
W#1 DoublesNiki Moss / Anna Marino vs Amanda Fredericks / Chenyi Qiu7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Yanik vs Qingru Xu0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Burchett / Dezirae Shukla vs Laura Moffett / Allyson Foster6-3, 7-6
2026-04-30vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Niki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks / Laura Moffett4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Lyons / Tara Lopez vs Qingru Xu / Allyson Foster3-6, 2-6
2026-04-21vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Niki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks / Allyson Foster6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Lyons / Elizabeth Yanik vs Qingru Xu / Chenyi Qiu4-6, 1-6
2026-04-12vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Schuler / Dezirae Shukla vs Laura Moffett / Qingru Xu6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTara Lopez / Lindsey Burchett vs Allyson Foster / Chenyi Qiu6-1, 6-3
2026-03-25vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnna Marino vs Chenyi Qiu4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTara Lopez / Dezirae Shukla vs Amanda Fredericks / Meghan Whitlow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-19vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Burchett / Natalie Schuler vs Chenyi Qiu / Qingru Xu6-7, 6-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Yanik vs Laura Moffett5-7, 4-6
2026-03-04vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Dezirae Shukla vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Burchett / Tara Lopez vs Qingru Xu / Meghan Whitlow6-4, 7-5
2026-02-25vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Dezirae Shukla vs Amanda Fredericks / Meghan Whitlow3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Marino vs Qingru Xu3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Lyons / Tara Lopez vs Allyson Foster / Sarah Watts6-0, 6-2
2026-02-21vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesDezirae Shukla / Megan Lyons vs Amanda Fredericks / Qingru Xu0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Laura Moffett4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Tara Lopez vs Meghan Whitlow / Sarah Watts6-0, 6-1
2026-02-17vs KY/LEX/FosterWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Lopez / Megan Lyons vs Sarah Watts / Meghan Whitlow6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Marino vs Amanda Fredericks7-5, 6-1
2026-02-04vs KY/LEX/FosterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNiki Moss / Dezirae Shukla vs Qingru Xu / Meghan Whitlow6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Lyons / Anna Marino vs Amanda Fredericks / Sarah Watts4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-01vs KY/LEX/FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesTara Lopez / Anna Marino vs Laura Moffett / Qingru Xu1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Dezirae Shukla vs Sarah Watts / Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women (Session 2) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Lindsey Burchett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Niki Moss
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.26
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.26
Anna Marino
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 2.5
2.19
Dezirae Shukla
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
2.13
Megan Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Tara Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Natalie Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Moss + Anna Marino3253% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Yanik + Dezirae Shukla213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Lyons + Tara Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Burchett
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Niki Moss
14W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Elizabeth Yanik
9W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Anna Marino
20W–23L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Dezirae Shukla
4W–10L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Megan Lyons
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Tara Lopez
6W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Natalie Schuler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.