Teams

Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-23vs Powers/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Buchler / Stephanie Boh vs Macey Osorno / Kristen Singer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Saucier / Laura Thomas vs Beth Juge / Shannon DuMontier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Roth / Kelly Phillips vs Ashley Boisfontaine / Jennifer Jouandot2-6, 0-6
2025-09-02vs Potts/18/5.5/CWN/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesEileen Devall / Enid Fahrenholt vs Laura Potts / Julie Norman7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Saucier / Laura Thomas vs Kristi Joseph / Megan Manning6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMerideth Eldridge / Margaret Cheramie vs Catherine Smith / Adair Weekley1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Brown/Held/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Centola / Kimberly Ellis vs Susan Kurtz / Hellen Cappo3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Phillips / Laura Thomas vs Cleo Pappas / Giang Smith1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Mercer / Merideth Eldridge vs Victoria Judge / Amanda Held3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Centola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Kimberly Buchler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Kimberly Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Kelly Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.86
Erin Hall
published
Amiee Dill
published
Eileen Devall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Enid Fahrenholt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Saucier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kerrie Slaton
published
Liesa Smith
published
Margaret Cheramie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Merideth Eldridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Mercer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Boh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Centola
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Buchler
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Kimberly Ellis
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%27%73%
2.58
Kelly Phillips
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Erin Hall
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Amiee Dill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eileen Devall
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Enid Fahrenholt
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erin Saucier
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerrie Slaton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Liesa Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Cheramie
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Merideth Eldridge
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Mercer
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Boh
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.