Teams

TLBKO-Kosior/Edgemoor 55+ B

2025 Lake USTA Tri Level 55 & Over · Women's Division B (4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-12vs TLSBE-Beardslee/Westport 55+ BWon 30
W#1 DoublesFilomena Ferri / Annie Edenfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Heredia / Monica Galloway vs Christina Mullen / Kathleen Stiffler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Welch / Katherine Karnatz vs Zahra Simonetti / Amy Cullen7-6, 7-5
2025-08-05vs TLNSO-Soos/CRP Tri 55+ BLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Kosior / Filomena Ferri vs Karen Hallman / Odette Baker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Galloway / Carolyn Peacock vs Amy Marin / Beth Packard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Welch / Katherine Karnatz vs Christin Darnell / Monaliza Onia5-7, 3-6
2025-07-30vs TLKED-Edge/RRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Kosior / SHARON WELLS vs Janet Szilagyi / Sharon Kerns1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Allison / Monica Galloway vs Julli Goodwin / Dawn Bush3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAnnie Edenfield / Linda Dove vs Peg Blomme / Donna Strauss3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Peacock / Jane Heredia vs Norma Zitnik / Anneliese Lansing6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Deborah Aspin vs Tammy Fisher / Jennifer Arko6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs TLSBE-Beardslee/Westport 55+ BWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnie Edenfield / Filomena Ferri vs Christina Mullen / Patricia Ferguson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Clancy / Karen Allison vs Amy Cullen / Angela Jakeway6-1, 6-0
2025-07-01vs TLNSO-Soos/CRP Tri 55+ BWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Dove / Barbara Kosior vs Odette Baker / Erika Buchholz6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Allison / Jane Heredia vs Anna Bonham / Beth Packard6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Leslie Crane vs Mary Laliberte / Renee Brooks7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-27vs TLKED-Edge/RRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Dove / SHARON WELLS vs Janet Szilagyi / Sharon Kerns4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Allison / Monica Galloway vs Julli Goodwin / Lori Moon6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAnnie Edenfield / Barbara Kosior vs Peg Blomme / Amy Michalski6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephanie Clancy / Carolyn Peacock vs Anneliese Lansing / Ursula Kleimeier6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina Krohn / Katherine Karnatz vs Wendy Goodwin / Brenda Jandebeur5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Division B (4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Annie Edenfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
SHARON WELLS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Linda Dove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Barbara Kosior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Filomena Ferri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Karen Allison
published
3.48
Carolyn Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Stephanie Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Monica Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jane Heredia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Katherine Karnatz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Deborah Aspin
published 3
2.70
Tina Krohn
published
2.67
Beth Welch
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Filomena Ferri + Carolyn Peacock9363% games+8.8% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Barbara Kosior11262% games+7.1% vs expected
SHARON WELLS + Barbara Kosior11357% games+4.9% vs expected
Annie Edenfield + SHARON WELLS6351% games+4.5% vs expected
Filomena Ferri + Annie Edenfield141751% games+1.2% vs expected
Filomena Ferri + Stephanie Clancy141849% games+1.1% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Carolyn Peacock13361% games+0.6% vs expected
Stephanie Clancy + Annie Edenfield91746% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Edenfield
179W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
SHARON WELLS
119W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Linda Dove
67W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Barbara Kosior
145W–132L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Filomena Ferri
135W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Karen Allison
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carolyn Peacock
86W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Stephanie Clancy
222W–140L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Monica Galloway
147W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Jane Heredia
134W–121L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–171L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Deborah Aspin
44W–69L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Tina Krohn
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Beth Welch
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.