Teams

PHX/Johnson/55Over/9.0M

2022 SPRING Adult 55 & Over - CAZ · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-03vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Diefenderfer / Shawn Hayes vs Ryu Iwai / Dan Maggio6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike James / Joel Robison vs Joseph Martinez / Michael McMullen7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBert Hayenga / Joe Johnson vs Claude Maraoui / Jon Weiss6-1, 6-2
2022-03-27vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesCort Alcott / Flavio Martinez vs Arno Leskinen / Michael McMullen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike James / Joel Robison vs Ryu Iwai / Jon Weiss6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Dowse / Bert Hayenga vs Joseph Martinez / Gary Hattendorf6-2, 6-3
2022-03-20vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Diefenderfer / Shawn Hayes vs Keith Cahill / Gary Hattendorf3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCort Alcott / Bert Hayenga vs Ryu Iwai / Jon Weiss3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoel Robison / D WILLIAMS vs Joseph Martinez / Claude Maraoui6-1, 6-0
2022-03-13vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 21
L#1 DoublesCort Alcott / Bert Hayenga vs Jose Rojas / Gary Hattendorf3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Johnson / Michael Dowse vs Arno Leskinen / Marco Rovegno6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoel Robison / Michael Flinn vs Ryu Iwai / Robert Holmes6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-06vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike James / Michael Flinn vs Jose Rojas / Gary Hattendorf6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFlavio Martinez / D WILLIAMS vs Keith Cahill / Ryu Iwai5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoe Johnson / Matt Peck vs Michael McMullen / Jon Weiss2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-27vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 21
W#1 DoublesBert Hayenga / Cort Alcott vs Dan Maggio / Joseph Martinez6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFlavio Martinez / Michael Dowse vs Keith Cahill / Gary Hattendorf6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Peck / Joel Robison vs Ryu Iwai / Jon Weiss6-4, 7-6
2022-02-13vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesCort Alcott / Bert Hayenga vs Michael McMullen / Ryu Iwai6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoel Robison / D WILLIAMS vs Joseph Martinez / Jon Weiss6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Flinn / Matt Peck vs Dan Maggio / Keith Cahill6-1, 6-0
2022-02-06vs 9.0 ISP Martinez M55SWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Flinn / Joel Robison vs Keith Cahill / Robert Holmes6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCort Alcott / Bert Hayenga vs Ryu Iwai / Gary Hattendorf6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Diefenderfer / D WILLIAMS vs Michael McMullen / Arno Leskinen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Johnson/55Over/9.0M6217718177
29.0 ISP Martinez M55S2671737263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Joel Robison
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
4.38
Bert Hayenga
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.34
Cort Alcott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Brian Schaaf
published 4.5
4.25
Shawn Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
D WILLIAMS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.64
Carlos Olivas
published 4.5
Joe Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matt Peck
published
Michael Dowse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Flinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mike James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cort Alcott + Bert Hayenga6363% gamesnot enough data
Joel Robison + Michael Flinn5073% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joel Robison
138W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Bert Hayenga
21W–5L career · type S · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Cort Alcott
38W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Brian Schaaf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shawn Hayes
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
D WILLIAMS
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Carlos Olivas
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.64
Joe Johnson
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Peck
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Dowse
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Flinn
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike James
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.