Teams

Sorensen

2021 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-30vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nastase / Craig Hendricks vs Debra Adams / Richard Shaw4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYungpo Su / Brandi Goldapp vs Lori Schmaderer / Roger Penland6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Blake / Joseph Lopez-Wilson vs Scott Lilleskov / Kelli Fitzgerald Draper1-6, 3-6
2021-04-23vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Nastase / Craig Hendricks vs Tami Bourland / Richard Shaw7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEileen Halpine / Adrian Blake vs Sandra Zebrowski / Roger Penland1-6, 0-6
2021-04-16vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nastase / Satya Maddipati vs Rachel O'Malley / Ted Plugge3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshwin Chandran / Julie Hewett vs John Walker / Kathryn Walker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Blake / Joseph Lopez-Wilson vs Lori Schmaderer / Nigel O'Mahony7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-09vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlice Blake / Joseph Lopez-Wilson vs Sandra Zebrowski / Adam Gouttierre1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdrian Blake / Eileen Halpine vs Kathryn Walker / John Walker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTraci Harrison / Satya Maddipati vs Tami Bourland / Scott Lilleskov2-6, 1-6
2021-04-02vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandi Goldapp / Yungpo Su vs Tami Bourland / Scott Lilleskov2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshwin Chandran / Julie Hewett vs Rachel O'Malley / Ted Plugge6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCraig Hendricks / Amy Schinco vs Debra Adams / Richard Shaw3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-03-26vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSatya Maddipati / Kimberly Nastase vs Adam Gouttierre / Sandra Zebrowski3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdrian Blake / Eileen Halpine vs John Walker / Kathryn Walker1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Lopez-Wilson / Brandi Goldapp vs Nigel O'Mahony / Kelli Fitzgerald Draper7-5, 6-3
2021-03-19vs NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXDWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlice Blake / Joseph Lopez-Wilson vs Sandra Zebrowski / Adam Gouttierre0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSatya Maddipati / Amy Schinco vs Nigel O'Mahony / Kelli Fitzgerald Draper7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdrian Blake / Eileen Halpine vs Roger Penland / Lori Schmaderer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team TriCity6015310117
2NE/Penland-Erwin/40&over7.0MXD5213818158
3Joseph3381023184
4Sorensen2581328212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Brandi Goldapp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amy Schinco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Eileen Halpine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Satya Maddipati
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Alice Blake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Craig Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kimberly Nastase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Adrian Blake
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Joseph Lopez-Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Julie Hewett
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Traci Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yungpo Su
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Hendricks + Kimberly Nastase91050% games+0.3% vs expected
Alice Blake + Joseph Lopez-Wilson5643% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Halpine + Adrian Blake1520% gamesnot enough data
Brandi Goldapp + Joseph Lopez-Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Nastase + Adrian Blake033 matchesnot enough data
Alice Blake + Adrian Blake213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandi Goldapp
141W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Amy Schinco
47W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Eileen Halpine
11W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Satya Maddipati
90W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Alice Blake
80W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Craig Hendricks
30W–41L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Nastase
81W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Adrian Blake
34W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96
Joseph Lopez-Wilson
47W–46L career · 13 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Hewett
66W–55L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Traci Harrison
44W–24L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Yungpo Su
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.