Teams

Freese - Nice Tri

2025 Baltimore Tri-Level Women · Baltimore Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-04vs BakerLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Dempsey / Sandra Kick vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Kim Steffen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Carolyn Wescott vs Kimberly Ford / Kimberly Sandhu6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Myers / Emily Trochimowicz vs Kristen Hessen / Martha Whitty7-5, 6-3
2025-03-29vs BakerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurie Freese / Sandra Kick vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Susan Sibol6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Kristin Seidl vs Jennifer Keetley / Beth van Derslice6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrina Culbreath / Christine Hammann vs Martha Whitty / Kristen Hessen6-4, 6-3
2025-03-23vs BakerLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurie Freese / Jill Rose vs Pamela Baker / Christine Ioannou6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWenxi Li / Carolyn Wescott vs Kimberly Ford / Cintya Leveque6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Hammann / Emily Trochimowicz vs Ginny Spivey / Martha Whitty6-7, 3-5
2025-03-22vs BakerLost 02
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Kristin Seidl vs Kimberly Ford / Cintya Leveque2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Myers / Emily Trochimowicz vs Jennifer Keetley / Martha Whitty4-6, 5-7
2025-03-16vs BakerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Dempsey / Sandra Kick vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Kim Steffen4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWenxi Li / Carolyn Wescott vs Cintya Leveque / Kimberly Sandhu4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTrina Culbreath / Christine Hammann vs Ginny Spivey / Martha Whitty2-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs BakerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Rose / Sandra Kick vs Pamela Baker / Christine Ioannou6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Hammann / Jessica Myers vs Kristen Hessen / Jennifer Keetley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-23vs BakerLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurie Freese / Jill Rose vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Susan Sibol6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWenxi Li / Carolyn Wescott vs Cintya Leveque / Beth van Derslice6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTrina Culbreath / Jessica Myers vs Jennifer Keetley / Martha Whitty2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Rose
published
3.82
Laurie Freese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Wenxi Li
published
3.68
Kate Dempsey
published
3.67
Sandra Kick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
3.29
GENA CHUNG
published 3.5
3.18
Carolyn Wescott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Emily Trochimowicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Christine Hammann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jessica Myers
published
2.73
Trina Culbreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Trochimowicz + Trina Culbreath3256% games+10.3% vs expected
Kristin Seidl + Carolyn Wescott3641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
46W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Laurie Freese
100W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Wenxi Li
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Kate Dempsey
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Sandra Kick
97W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–130L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Carolyn Wescott
59W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Emily Trochimowicz
103W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Jessica Myers
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Trina Culbreath
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.