Teams

Sunset Depoach Mode

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-10vs Westlake Tennis 3.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesTanya Thompson / SANDI WISE vs Susan Cass / Frances Kharaghani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Brown / Keressa Garland vs Lisa Weiss / Mary Crossley7-5, 6-1
2026-06-04vs Mission Oaks Parks & WreckLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Berger / Ina Kim vs Michelle Duddy / Roberta Reis4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Meckfessel / Wendy Brown vs Denise Bolish / Kristin Casanova2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs Up Your AcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLeah Cassar vs Silvia Benun5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesIna Kim / Jennifer Meckfessel vs Laura Leff / Amy Whitney7-5, 6-1
2026-05-20vs 40 LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaudia Bay / Leah Cassar vs Sarah Smith / Mary Ann Fermin0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Meckfessel vs Mia Skelton6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaudia Bay / Ina Kim vs Zhara Astra / Candice Marderosian6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-07vs Pierpont RacquettesWon 20
W#2 DoublesWendy Brown / Judy Eisenbrand vs Diana Trinh-Salzer / Lucia Shanahan6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Lawrence / Jennifer Meckfessel vs Erin Kraus / Mariana Schindler6-2, 7-5
2026-04-29vs Las Posas Sun SlammersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lambert / Kate Centanni vs Jaimee Seay / Tera Williams5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTanya Thompson vs Barbara Sandrasagra0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesIna Kim / Jennifer Meckfessel vs Carrie Kelleher / Jill Heybl6-4, 6-4
2026-04-22vs Mission Oaks Love HurtsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJudy Eisenbrand vs Tracy Leiterman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKate Centanni / Leah Cassar vs Leslie Gache / Eva Ettedgui6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Laura Berger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Ina Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.24
Kate Centanni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Dana Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Wendy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Gina Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Tanya Thompson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Leah Cassar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Marie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Claudia Bay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keressa Garland + Wendy Brown3257% games+7.6% vs expected
Keressa Garland + Claudia Bay2446% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Bay + Gina Vazquez044 matchesnot enough data
Dana Lawrence + Jennifer Meckfessel404 matchesnot enough data
Gina Vazquez + Jennifer Meckfessel224 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Claudia Bay213 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Tanya Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Gina Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Berger
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Judy Eisenbrand
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
30W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Gina Vazquez
95W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Claudia Bay
67W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.