Teams

Sequoyah/Debi Williams

2026 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sequoyah/Debi Williams317511103
2Suskind135715113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Olivia Williams
published
3.46
Shirley Rutledge
published
3.35
Charlie Lewis
published 3.5
3.35
Julie Briggs
published
3.22
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Bonnie Burden
published 3.5
2.93
Chelsey Ogles
published 3
2.87
Abbigail Henry
published 3
2.86
Karlene Welty
published
2.78
Debi Williams
published 3
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
Lan Le
published
Margie DeShon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Burden + Jewel Akpose224 matchesnot enough data
Karlene Welty + Bonnie Burden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Williams
29W–35L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Shirley Rutledge
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
3.5
Charlie Lewis
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Julie Briggs
19W–9L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
Jewel Akpose
53W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.22
3.5
Bonnie Burden
17W–31L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Chelsey Ogles
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Abbigail Henry
16W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Karlene Welty
13W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Debi Williams
22W–31L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lan Le
21W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.