Teams

Bayati, Mitra

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-20vs Stein, VictoriaWon 30
W#1 DoublesRose Edmonston / Danette Tannehill vs Victoria Stein / Kelsey Sims6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmber Austin / Sherry Bouldin vs Meg Newman / Amy Dixon6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bailey / Charlotte Crisler vs Morgan Jones / Allison Thigpen6-0, 6-0
2026-08-19vs Chen, AnneWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexandria Sylvester / Amber Austin vs Megan Lyon / Kym Gore6-3, 6-0
2026-08-12vs Todd, ChloeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaiti Stewart / Amber Austin vs Kayli Rutland / Anna Alderman4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOlivia Barnard / Nikki Summers vs Tori Campbell / Erin Barrios6-3, 6-2
2026-08-05vs Welch, JanaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmber Austin / Kaiti Stewart vs Heather Drummond / Winky Newman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bayati, Mitra2051226
2Ford, Kelli2051232
3Clark, Robin1133641
4Bryan, Emily0112426
5Welch, Jana0103636
6Todd, Chloe0224865

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Jennifer Sylvester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Amber Austin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.32
Danette Tannehill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Rose Edmonston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Charlotte Crisler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Sherry Bouldin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Nikki Summers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mitra Bayati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Timika Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Crisler + Timika Franklin0638% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Sylvester
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
2.5
Amber Austin
15W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
2.5
Danette Tannehill
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Rose Edmonston
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Charlotte Crisler
19W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Sherry Bouldin
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Nikki Summers
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Mitra Bayati
15W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timika Franklin
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.