Teams

Smouni/LR/PVCC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-23vs Abston/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 DoublesBradley Hogate / Shelby Fisher vs Blake Abston / Lauren Shillcutt7-6, 6-0
2025-01-28vs Ritchie/LR/CCLRWon 20
W#1 SinglesBradley Hogate vs William Pollock6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesScott Yant vs James Ritchie6-4, 6-2
2024-12-05vs Nerusupalli/LR/RebSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJohn Limozaine vs Goutham Gola4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesVivek Yadala vs Kaushik Nerusupalli6-3, 6-0
2024-11-19vs Szeto/LR/RebWon 10
W#1 SinglesVivek Yadala vs Patrick Szeto5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Nelsen/LR/BPLost 01
L#1 SinglesBradley Hogate vs Matthew Nelsen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-07vs Abston/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 SinglesBradley Hogate vs Michael McGrew6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Bradley Hogate
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Scott Yant
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.00
William Kalkbrenner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Andrew Adkins
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Hatim Smouni
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
John Limozaine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Taylor Smith
published
Vivek Yadala
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Yant + Bradley Hogate4157% games+7.9% vs expected
Hatim Smouni + Bradley Hogate3344% games−0.8% vs expected
Hatim Smouni + Andrew Adkins033 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Hogate + Andrew Adkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradley Hogate
28W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Scott Yant
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
William Kalkbrenner
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Andrew Adkins
43W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Hatim Smouni
26W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
John Limozaine
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Taylor Smith
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vivek Yadala
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.