Teams

SFT:Spark F&T:Higgins/Kennelly

2022 EMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-25vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Higgins / Erik Muench vs Richard DiMaggio / Neil Whitehouse4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEVERARD HATCH / James White vs Joseph Olson / Jonathan Round4-6, 2-6
2022-08-19vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 02
L#2 DoublesAndrew Buttress / Ron Rebeiro vs Richard DiMaggio / Paul Sliker3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Surak / James White vs Jonathan Round / Neil Whitehouse6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-08-15vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEVERARD HATCH / Michel VanRavestyn vs Paul Gudonis / Neil Whitehouse6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJames White / Ron Rebeiro vs Richard DiMaggio / Paul Sliker6-7, 1-6
2022-08-11vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames McDaniel / Michel VanRavestyn vs Paul Gudonis / Richard Tremblay1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Higgins / Ron Rebeiro vs Michael Butter / Neil Whitehouse4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Surak / James White vs Joseph Olson / Lawrence Schall0-6, 2-6
2022-08-10vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 12
L#1 DoublesTED BORSETI / James McDaniel vs Michael Butter / Neil Whitehouse4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrian DiMartinis / James White vs Joseph Olson / Lawrence Schall6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Buttress / Erik Muench vs Paul Gudonis / Richard Tremblay0-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 12
W#1 DoublesEVERARD HATCH / James McDaniel vs Richard DiMaggio / Paul Sliker6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Higgins / Michel VanRavestyn vs Joseph Olson / Lawrence Schall0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Cappello / Joseph Surak vs Michael Butter / Neil Whitehouse3-6, 1-6
2022-07-27vs BRTC:Bass River:Butter/WhitehouseLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichel VanRavestyn / EVERARD HATCH vs Richard DiMaggio / Jonathan Round6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTED BORSETI / James McDaniel vs Joseph Olson / Lawrence Schall2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRon Rebeiro / James White vs Michael Butter / Neil Whitehouse3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRTC:Bass River:Butter/Whitehouse0714715152
2SFT:Spark F&T:Higgins/Kennelly0761530206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
EVERARD HATCH
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Michel VanRavestyn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Erik Muench
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
James McDaniel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Kelly Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Buttress
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Brian DiMartinis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Charles Cappello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Surak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Rebeiro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
TED BORSETI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michel VanRavestyn + Kelly Higgins3248% gamesnot enough data
Michel VanRavestyn + EVERARD HATCH3258% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Surak + Kelly Higgins224 matchesnot enough data
James McDaniel + EVERARD HATCH213 matchesnot enough data
James McDaniel + TED BORSETI123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
EVERARD HATCH
38W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Michel VanRavestyn
68W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Erik Muench
21W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
James McDaniel
38W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Higgins
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Andrew Buttress
1W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Brian DiMartinis
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Charles Cappello
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Surak
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Rebeiro
8W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
TED BORSETI
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.