Teams

Smith, Autumn

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Bond, EmmaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Brunson / Kathrynrose Kidd vs Beverly Turner / Amanda Clark6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Randall / Elizabeth Derck vs Anne Stanton / Wendy George6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAutumn Smith / Audrey Youngblood vs Jordan Mitchell Walker / Alex Miller6-7, 1-6
2026-08-18vs Bailey, HeatherLost 01
L#2 DoublesAutumn Smith / SarahEllen Krivanec vs Julie Barry / Jayme Griffin1-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs Sykes, JoannaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAutumn Smith / Elizabeth Derck vs Audrey Page / Nealie Cooper7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMartha Ann Thorne / Douglas Loftin vs Amy Sherman / Ginny Sims6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaden Taylor / Mary Nicholas vs Anita Trigg / Kimberly Wooten6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith, Autumn1021226
2Ramsey, Nikki1021330
3Stewart, Kaiti000000
4Bond, Emma000000
5Webb, Jill000000
6Hodges, Martha000000
7Sykes, Joanna0112535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Lindsey Brunson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Autumn Smith
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Martha Ann Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kathrynrose Kidd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Audrey Youngblood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Jaden Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Brittany Myers
published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Derck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Claire Ewing
published 3
2.66
Douglas Loftin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Erica Stutzman
published 3
Mary Nicholas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Autumn Smith + Audrey Youngblood6264% games+13.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Brunson
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Autumn Smith
43W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Martha Ann Thorne
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kathrynrose Kidd
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Audrey Youngblood
42W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jaden Taylor
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Brittany Myers
35W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elizabeth Derck
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Claire Ewing
10W–18L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Douglas Loftin
3W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Erica Stutzman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Mary Nicholas
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.