Teams

Senter CFCC 7.5

2025 South East Tennis Combo 18 & OVER · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-26vs GreeneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Taylor / Jennifer Parrotte vs Leslie Barker / Courtney Kingston3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Beth Deans / Miriam Thompson vs Heather Weddle / Kris Foster6-3, 6-2
2025-10-22vs Robbins/MurrayWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley DeGroote / Jennifer Parrotte vs Kathryn Weeks / Vickie Kosh6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMiriam Thompson / Jenna Stachowiak vs Christine Tryer / Donna Beaman6-0, 6-2
2025-10-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Senter / Margaret Chadwick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-18vs HallerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKylie Knapp / Elise Rouse vs Kim Byrd / Caitlynn Goheen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Waren / Jenna Stachowiak vs Kristen Butler / Pati DeOliva6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Chadwick / Sara Beth Gammons vs Kelly Flynn / Kristina Durham6-2, 6-0
2025-09-27vs Robbins/MurrayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiriam Thompson / Heather Senter vs Sara Borcherding / Beth Skidmore7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs GreeneLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Reynolds / Heather Senter vs Deedee Greene / Leslie Barker5-7, 6-7
2025-09-06vs HallerWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Beth Deans / Kylie Knapp vs Kelly Flynn / Pati DeOliva6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Taylor / Jennifer Parrotte vs Renee Saffo / Kristina Durham6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley DeGroote / Sara Beth Gammons vs Linda Haller / Kathleen Glancy6-4, 6-0
2025-08-23vs McCabe 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Anna Taylor vs Nicole Slocumb / Laurie Sullivan3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Miriam Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Kylie Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Jenna Stachowiak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Elise Rouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Janet Waren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Ashley DeGroote
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Margaret Chadwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Anna Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Heather Senter
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Janik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Sarah Beth Deans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Jennifer Parrotte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Beth Gammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Taylor + Elise Rouse6161% games+21.0% vs expected
Ashley DeGroote + Kristine Janik303 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Janik + Margaret Chadwick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam Thompson
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kylie Knapp
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Jenna Stachowiak
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Elise Rouse
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Janet Waren
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Ashley DeGroote
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Margaret Chadwick
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Anna Taylor
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Heather Senter
243W–166L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kristine Janik
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
Sarah Beth Deans
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jennifer Parrotte
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Sara Beth Gammons
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.