Teams

LATA18/Bailey/LCTC

2025 Fall 18 & Over-LATA · Fall Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-10vs LATA18/Brown/CAMPWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynn Thomas / Michelle Connor vs Fran Eleazer / Jeanie Farmer6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaliska Vazquez vs Brooke Smith1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Bailey / Taylor Wray vs Beth Hunter / Tracie Ifkovits6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTorry Dickey vs Natalie Miller6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Maira Trimble
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Taylor Wray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.89
Michelle Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Patty Spires
published
2.87
Elizabeth Regan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kaliska Vazquez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Mary Sarah Komar
published
2.78
Torry Dickey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Abbey Culvern
published 3
Anna Mills Cox
published 3
2.72
Melissa Forrest
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.67
2.56
Heather Pate
published 3
2.47
Lindsay Copelan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Sarah Komar + Kaliska Vazquez6262% games+4.3% vs expected
Heather Pate + Melissa Forrest314 matchesnot enough data
Torry Dickey + Patty Spires303 matchesnot enough data
Heather Pate + Kaliska Vazquez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maira Trimble
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Taylor Wray
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Michelle Connor
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Patty Spires
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Elizabeth Regan
48W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Kaliska Vazquez
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Mary Sarah Komar
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Torry Dickey
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Abbey Culvern
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anna Mills Cox
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Forrest
26W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Anne Spencer Muncy
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Heather Pate
36W–34L career · no lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
2.56
Lindsay Copelan
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.