Teams

V - Sunset Heat Wave

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WD · V - Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-24vs V - Rancho Madera Get A GripWon 20
W#1 SinglesWyne Quinn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Bell / SANDI WISE vs Jill Evans / Lisa Assouad6-4, 6-4
2023-02-13vs V - Mission Oaks Feel the LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWyne Quinn / Phyllis Isenberg vs Patricia Dunn / Annie Schwartz7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSANDI WISE / Deborah Cassar vs Patti Brugman / Rita Bruno4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWyne Quinn / Tammy Bell vs Wendy Fletcher / Karen Rosenberg1-6, 3-6
2023-02-03vs V - Westlake Anchors and AcesLost 01
L#1 SinglesGrace Berman vs Heather Morganson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-01-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesSANDI WISE / Deborah Cassar vs Martha Estevis / Kristin Pena6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Elain Cleary
published
3.95
Victoria Silver
published
3.84
Tammy Bell
published
3.69
Heather McGregor
published
3.58
Wyne Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Sharon Li
published
3.39
SANDI WISE
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.22
Pam Schuberg
published
3.06
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
Grace Berman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Susan Dahlberg
published
Yeisy Nielson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Li + Heather McGregor4252% games−4.0% vs expected
SANDI WISE + Wyne Quinn7461% gamesnot enough data
Grace Berman + SANDI WISE033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elain Cleary
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
4.14
Victoria Silver
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
Tammy Bell
31W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
Heather McGregor
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Sharon Li
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Pam Schuberg
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Grace Berman
29W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan Dahlberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yeisy Nielson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.