Teams

LORENZI PARK

2022 USTA MIXED LEAGUE 18 & OVER- 10.0 · MIXED 10.0

11 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-22vs NV/HUBBARD/MIXED 18 & OVER 10.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFrideric Prandecki / Nikki Newell vs Sean Hubbard / Janessa Wilson7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJean-Laurent Pageault / Tiffany Newell vs Raymond Weich / Kara Sherwood4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Mims / Ashley Prandecki vs Sean Amberg / Regina Suarez5-7, 6-7
2022-05-21vs NV/HUBBARD/MIXED 18 & OVER 10.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMckay Novak / Max Novak vs Sean Hubbard / Janessa Wilson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Prandecki / Matthew Mims vs Raymond Weich / Kara Sherwood5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJean-Laurent Pageault / Tiffany Newell vs Sean Amberg / Regina Suarez6-3, 6-1
2022-05-21vs NV/HUBBARD/MIXED 18 & OVER 10.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFrideric Prandecki / Nikki Newell vs Sean Hubbard / Janessa Wilson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMax Novak / Ashley Prandecki vs Kara Sherwood / Raymond Weich2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAphrah Brokaw / Ryan Gormley vs Sean Amberg / Regina Suarez4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 10.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Frideric Prandecki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.46
Matthew Mims
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
Aphrah Brokaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Prandecki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jean-Laurent Pageault
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Max Novak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mckay Novak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki Newell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Gormley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Newell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Trenton Alenik
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Frideric Prandecki
33W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Matthew Mims
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
4.46
Aphrah Brokaw
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ashley Prandecki
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean-Laurent Pageault
30W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Max Novak
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mckay Novak
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nikki Newell
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Gormley
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Newell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trenton Alenik
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.