Teams

Sportime HI Net Assets 18+ 3.5 Day

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 3.5 Day

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-26vs MBYC 18+ 3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesKatie Benedict / Sarah Raeben vs Denise Regan / Lisa Samson6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSara Willison vs Pier Witek6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMolly Broaddus / Erika Jaeger vs Jenny Rende / Suzie Hanna1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Lapkin / Gunda Sabel-Sheehan vs Jennifer Barney / Janice Loll6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAmy Kline / Katie Benedict vs Alexandra Nicklas / Christine O'Keefe6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSara Willison vs Yang Chen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Lapkin / Courtney WALKER vs Jessica Eisenberg / Elif Arkun4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLee Wipper / April Klein vs Anita Hoag / Linda Lewinter6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs WTC: Sun. Set. Match - 18+ 3.5 DayLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Murphy / Sarah Raeben vs Kristin Martinez / Katie Watson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Kline vs Valerie Chuebon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Lapkin / Gunda Sabel-Sheehan vs Paisley Fenyes / Christine Baron6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Ferree / Fran Smith vs Jaclyn Aronson / Georgia Dyer1-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs WTC: Sun. Set. Match - 18+ 3.5 DaySplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Kline / Susanne Sparks vs Katie Watson / Philippa Hartman2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSara Willison vs Valerie Chuebon6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGunda Sabel-Sheehan / Paula Lapkin vs Samara Graca / Jaclyn Aronson4-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesLee Wipper / Lisa Ferree vs Georgia Dyer / Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt7-5, 6-1
2026-05-28vs Flint Park 18+ 3.5 DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusanne Sparks / Katie Benedict vs Simone Ririmasse / Theresa Sim2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Lapkin / Gunda Sabel-Sheehan vs Elizabeth Haggerty / Virginia Watts6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesApril Klein / Courtney WALKER vs Ulrike Heregger / Wendy Sayles6-3, 6-4
2026-05-14vs NRRC - 18+ 3.5 Day- Roc SolidWon 31
L#1 DoublesLinda Solomon / Susanne Sparks vs Carolyn Comizio / Carrie Foley4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLee Wipper vs Jen Turner-Finley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Benedict / Molly Broaddus vs Amy Kellogg / Karen Strating6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Lapkin / Courtney WALKER vs Deborah von Glahn / Janice Kopits6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLinda Solomon / Erika Jaeger vs Deanna Rahman / Mary Anne McTiernan6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAmy Kline vs Jillian Grubert6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJillian McAlley / Sarah Raeben vs Carol Tse / Lisa Schneider6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Ferree / Lee Wipper vs Stephanie Balkin / Sarah Miller7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMolly Broaddus / Jennifer Murphy vs Anna Schuler / Alexis Capezza7-5, 6-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Raeben vs Randa Sauerborn7-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Kline / Katie Benedict vs Allison Prigozen / Stephanie Manheim0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFran Smith / Courtney WALKER vs Meron Shewarega / Kathleen Finlay3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Sara Willison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Katie Benedict
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Raeben
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.24
Jillian McAlley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Gunda Sabel-Sheehan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Molly Broaddus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Linda Solomon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Amy Kline
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Courtney WALKER
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Ferree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Paula Lapkin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Erika Jaeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
April Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Lee Wipper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.94
2.86
Kathleen Charla
published
2.84
Elana Minkove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Fran Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Murphy
published
Rebecca Stern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Raeben + Lisa Ferree4262% games+11.0% vs expected
Katie Benedict + Rebecca Stern5255% games+8.9% vs expected
April Klein + Sarah Raeben9363% games+8.7% vs expected
Katie Benedict + Sarah Raeben32560% games+7.9% vs expected
Lee Wipper + April Klein11555% games+6.7% vs expected
April Klein + Lisa Ferree11255% games+3.9% vs expected
Lisa Ferree + Rebecca Stern12655% games+1.4% vs expected
Elana Minkove + Fran Smith16855% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Willison
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Katie Benedict
89W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sarah Raeben
100W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Jillian McAlley
87W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Gunda Sabel-Sheehan
49W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Molly Broaddus
63W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Linda Solomon
27W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Kline
176W–140L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Courtney WALKER
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lisa Ferree
89W–62L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Paula Lapkin
57W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Erika Jaeger
22W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
April Klein
139W–85L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Lee Wipper
125W–159L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Shiels Toland
34W–23L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Kathleen Charla
34W–28L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Elana Minkove
100W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Fran Smith
64W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Jennifer Murphy
30W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Stern
26W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.