Teams

Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 17 9:30 AM
vs
Oak Hollow Tennis Center
Sep 24 9:30 AM
vs
Latham Park Tennis Center
Oct 1 9:30 AM
vs
Oak Hollow Tennis Center
2026-09-03vs Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Whitney Ellis vs Leslie Marus / Elizabeth Jones6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSara Strassell / Sarah Gabriel vs Michele Alvarino / Olivia Linthavong1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Hedrick / Kristi Nicholson vs Aphton Lang / Holly Parr4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-27vs Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesLayne Saunders / Sarah Gabriel vs Michele Alvarino / Anna Mickleberry5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCj Isner / Morgan Qubein vs Ashley Jones / Tiffany Clark6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Strassell / Lauren Timcheck vs Kathryn Egerton / Jennifer Farino4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJordan Hedrick / Lauren Timcheck vs Leslie Marus / Anna Mickleberry3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mays / Kristi Nicholson vs Frannie Benfield / Michele Alvarino6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBridget Gislimberti / Danielle Wright vs Aphton Lang / Kelly Parr6-4, 7-5
2026-08-13vs Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesWhitney Ellis / Sarah Gabriel vs Ashley Jones / Elizabeth Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLayne Saunders / Morgan Qubein vs Michele Alvarino / Olivia Linthavong2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mays / Lauren Timcheck vs Holly Parr / Tiffany Clark6-2, 6-4
2026-08-06vs Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Faulkner / Bridget Gislimberti vs Leslie Marus / Lauren Varkey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristi Nicholson / Jennifer Mays vs Ashley Jones / Elizabeth Jones7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCj Isner / Lindsay Reynolds vs Jennifer Farino / Sue English6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Goy 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM2051442
2Isner/Strassell 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM2154989
3Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021222
4Dulin 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1021433
5Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1142548
6Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM1133863
7Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM1124847
8Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM1133960
9Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM12451177
10Russo 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM0224853
11Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM02151162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Bridget Gislimberti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Jordan Hedrick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.94
Whitney Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Layne Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Morgan Hood
published
3.76
Sara Strassell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Jennifer Mays
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Cj Isner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.47
Melissa Faulkner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Lindsay Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kristi Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Lauren Timcheck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Sarah Gabriel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241259% games+9.6% vs expected
Melissa Faulkner + Lauren Timcheck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Jordan Hedrick
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.98
Whitney Ellis
49W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Morgan Hood
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.76
Sara Strassell
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Jennifer Mays
70W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
4
Cj Isner
22W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Melissa Faulkner
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Lindsay Reynolds
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kristi Nicholson
72W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Lauren Timcheck
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Sarah Gabriel
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.