Teams

RH Sugar and Slice - C. Coyle

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-23vs PC Overserved - C. EicholtzLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Smedley / Carrie Renter vs Cindy Eicholtz / Caro Massari6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHedy Yuan Hou / Ann Johnston vs Ashley Reiss / Jody Jotham2-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs Avila Aces - I. PetersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Rowe / Ann Johnston vs Sally Sierra / Gail Wilson4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPojjamarn Simos vs Rachel Badyna6-3, 6-2
2025-05-02vs Buckhorn Lobstars - J. LindemulderLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Coyle / Susan Wade vs Amanda Smith / Catherine Kotson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPojjamarn Simos vs Holly Conte6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Morgan / Judy Bailey vs Jackie Lindemulder / Silvia Cuevas1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesKristin Rowe / Susan Wade vs Melissa Speidel / Michelle Graba2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarrie Renter vs Liza Geist6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSusan Wade / Kristin Rowe vs Michele Curtin / Stacy Leatherman6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Smedley vs Devon Connell6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Johnston / Hedy Yuan Hou vs Francesca LoMonaco / Lisa Lalis6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Pojjamarn Simos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Carrie Renter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.35
Christine Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Kristin Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Kirkham
published 2.5
2.23
Beth Smedley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Denise Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Judy Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Hedy Yuan Hou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Heather Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Bailey + Denise Morgan033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Coyle + Kristin Rowe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pojjamarn Simos
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Carrie Renter
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Christine Coyle
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Kristin Rowe
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Ashley Kirkham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Beth Smedley
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Denise Morgan
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Judy Bailey
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Hedy Yuan Hou
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Heather Torres
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.