Teams

MAC-White

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Bray / Delaney Rhodus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06vs MTC-ScammellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNaveen Chennupati / Bernice White vs AJ Mojaddidi / Marcy Kozlowski6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTom Rider / Delaney Rhodus vs Douglas Scammell / Lindsey Scammell4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2022-03-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Smith / Delaney Rhodus vs Eric Nelson / Isabel Lee7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-26vs ACAC-LarueWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Smith / Delaney Rhodus vs Kimberly Giancaspro / Terrance Milo6-0, 6-2
2022-02-20vs RAIN-RaghavanWon 10
W#1 DoublesNaveen Chennupati / Kaitlyn Mejia vs Seunghun Ok / Irina Schaffernoth6-1, 6-4
2022-02-06vs MAC-HuangWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Rider / Delaney Rhodus vs Rob Kirkconnell / Philathea Cole6-7, 2-0, 1-0
2022-01-09vs CSW-GeorgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarren Jones / Delaney Rhodus vs Lesley Terminella / David Israel2-6, 5-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Naveen Chennupati
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.16
Delaney Rhodus
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.78
Darren Jones
published 4
3.69
Leigh Ann Barker
published
3.41
Eunice Williams
published 3.5
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.27
Susanne Nazur
published
2.95
Bernice White
published 3
Kaitlyn Mejia
published
Tom Rider
published
Zach Pettit
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Naveen Chennupati
146W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Delaney Rhodus
132W–86L career · 9 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Darren Jones
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Leigh Ann Barker
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Eunice Williams
20W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Susanne Nazur
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Bernice White
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kaitlyn Mejia
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.