Teams

V - Wood Ranch Dukes

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - VENT · Ventura - Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-28vs V - Spanish Pier PiratesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Friefeld / Garen Amirganian vs Alan Siu / John Hagle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Richard Lee / Scott Nicholson1-6, 0-6
2022-11-12vs V - Mission Oaks Firecrackers IIWon 10
W#3 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Frank Swanson / Longbin Liu7-5, 7-5
2022-11-05vs V - Sunset Hills 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Friefeld / Jason Pivnik vs David Thompson / Fred Ackourey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-29vs V - Las Posas Tennis TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Winston Deardorff / William Dobbins2-6, 5-7
2022-10-08vs V - LLW WoodRanchHitmen-D FacianaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Pivnik / Kevin Humfreville vs Ankur Chadda / Eric Bumann0-6, 2-6
2022-10-02vs V - Libbey Park Chiefs PeakWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Pivnik / Garen Amirganian vs Danny Everett / Michael Kelley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-17vs V - North Ranch RenegadesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJason Pivnik / Brian Friefeld vs Daniel Whitney / Howard Berman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Sutterman / Garen Amirganian vs Richard Lieberman / Arkadi Chines3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
Andrew Cho
published 4
3.63
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.55
Kevin Humfreville
published
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Jason Pivnik
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Chang Yi
published 3.5
3.27
Mel Johnson
published
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
Jeff Sutterman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Pivnik + Garen Amirganian7849% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Andrew Cho
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kevin Humfreville
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Jason Pivnik
32W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Chang Yi
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Jeff Sutterman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.