Teams

CC Avila Make It A Double

2026 USTA CC Winter Mixed Doubles 18 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 7.0 18 & OVER

20 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-21vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Martin / Elise Beem vs Matthew Hiltner / Corrie Meals6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Ginn / Kanako Nakajima vs Jason Reinwald / Ramona Cabiles6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesErik Schiesl / Marie Loughead vs Bernie Cabiles / Yvonne Miller6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Martin / Brooke Barber vs Samantha Stollberg / Matthew Hiltner3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLee Wilkerson / Lauri Rainwater-Quinn vs Jason Reinwald / Ramona Cabiles3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesErik Schiesl / Marie Loughead vs Russell Harper / Yvonne Miller6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 7.0 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
David Tuttle
published 3.5
3.44
Dean Johnston
published 3.5
3.38
Brooke Barber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Chase Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Carolyn Doud
published 3.5
Emma Pelech
published 3.5
3.21
Elise Beem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Lauri Rainwater-Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Erik Schiesl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Michelle Pelech
published
3.04
Erin Sjoholm
published 3
3.04
Marie Loughead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Kanako Nakajima
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Larry Hecimovich
published
2.88
2.82
Melbra King
published
2.68
Joy Swann
published
Jim Pelech
published
Lee Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Ginn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Loughead + Erik Schiesl134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Tuttle
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Dean Johnston
9W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Brooke Barber
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Chase Martin
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Carolyn Doud
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Emma Pelech
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Elise Beem
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Lauri Rainwater-Quinn
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Erik Schiesl
3W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.19
Michelle Pelech
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3
Erin Sjoholm
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Marie Loughead
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kanako Nakajima
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Larry Hecimovich
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
Melbra King
14W–32L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Joy Swann
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Jim Pelech
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Wilkerson
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ginn
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.