Teams

Smith, John

2021 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-27vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGadi Bramson / Ravi Bhagat vs Gregory Mott / Jeff Taylor6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSteve Baker / Stuart Carrico vs Joe Lucas / Fen Wang3-6, 3-6
2021-06-13vs HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesGadi Bramson / Barry Waldron vs R Scott Hanover / Jeff Ganaden1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStuart Carrico / Bond Marrs vs Vernon Shand / Lanny Wake6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Smith / Brian Burton vs Brad Harding / Wayne McKamie4-6, 4-6
2021-06-06vs Bird, DavidWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Waldron / Jeffrey Marcott vs Peter Lazar / Michael Shinn1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBond Marrs / Stuart Carrico vs Robert Jolley / Mark Ruggles6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGadi Bramson / Ravi Bhagat vs David Bird / Gary Merrill6-4, 6-1
2021-05-23vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Marcott / Barry Waldron vs Joe Lucas / Fen Wang6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStuart Carrico / Bond Marrs vs Jeffrey Spivak / Jeff Taylor3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Baker / John Smith vs John Burdolski / Gregory Mott2-6, 3-6
2021-05-16vs HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Marcott / Barry Waldron vs Brad Harding / Chuck Raplinger2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStuart Carrico / Bond Marrs vs Michael Hiebert / Gregory Russell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Burton / John Smith vs Jan Claussen / R Scott Hanover4-6, 2-6
2021-05-02vs Bird, DavidLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarry Waldron / Jeffrey Marcott vs Jeff Harbin / Skip Johnson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBond Marrs / Stuart Carrico vs Neal Farnsworth / Gary Merrill5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Smith / Steve Baker vs Steven Osborne / David Bird2-6, 3-6
2021-04-25vs HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesBond Marrs / Stuart Carrico vs Fen Wang / Jeff Taylor3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarry Waldron / Jeffrey Marcott vs Norman Friedman / Kevin Harlan6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRavi Bhagat / Gadi Bramson vs Gregory Mott / Paul Norris6-4, 6-4
2021-04-18vs HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Burton / Nathan Granger vs Wayne McKamie / Gregory Russell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRavi Bhagat / Barry Waldron vs Chris Cox / Michael Hiebert3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBond Marrs / John Smith vs Vernon Shand / Lanny Wake2-6, 0-6
2021-04-11vs Bird, DavidLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathan Granger / John Smith vs David Bird / Steven Osborne3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBond Marrs / Stuart Carrico vs Neal Farnsworth / Skip Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Baker / Jeffrey Marcott vs Stan Chappell / Jeff Harbin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Cox/55&Over8.0M8121614183
2HOA/MottWC/55&Over8.0M6318923231
3Smith, John2791840299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Jeffrey Marcott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Bond Marrs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.71
Brian Burton
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
Ravi Bhagat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Gadi Bramson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Barry Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.14
Nathan Granger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Smith
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Steve Baker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stuart Carrico
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gadi Bramson + Steve Baker4253% games+3.5% vs expected
Gadi Bramson + Bond Marrs1540% games−6.2% vs expected
John Smith + Steve Baker0633% games−6.5% vs expected
Gadi Bramson + John Smith1531% gamesnot enough data
Barry Waldron + Jeffrey Marcott4149% gamesnot enough data
John Smith + Bond Marrs044 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Marcott + Steve Baker224 matchesnot enough data
Gadi Bramson + Ravi Bhagat303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Marcott
85W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Bond Marrs
42W–75L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Brian Burton
71W–55L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
Ravi Bhagat
20W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.50
4
Gadi Bramson
24W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Barry Waldron
7W–11L career · type A · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nathan Granger
27W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
John Smith
8W–27L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Baker
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stuart Carrico
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.