Teams

LSchoeck (Pine Lake)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-25vs CHelms (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Julie Smallwood vs Lu Ann Burke / Carol Childress3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Robin Boyles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-11vs LCunningham (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Julie Smallwood vs Teresa Brown / Dorothy Gandar6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-28vs KKing (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRene Griffin / Joan Bullard vs Sharon Cranford / Michele Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRobin Boyles / Lydia Schoeck vs Tracy Brading / Nan Miller1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Graham / Joan Bullard vs Rosie Rogers / Margaret Schrimsher2-6, 4-6
2022-02-28vs CHelms (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Graham / Joan Bullard vs Lee Page / Lisa Pacello2-6, 1-6
2022-02-21vs TRhyne (Russell)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Rene Griffin vs Leila Tissue / Robin Perkins2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Robin Boyles
published
3.33
Tracy Graham
published
Joan Bullard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Julie Smallwood
published
3.19
Connie Daniel
published 3.5
3.11
Ashle Basden
published 3.5
2.94
Rene Griffin
published
Dottie Boone
published
Karan Waddell
published
Susan Anthony
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Smallwood + Lydia Schoeck123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Graham + Karan Waddell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
Robin Boyles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tracy Graham
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Joan Bullard
30W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Smallwood
20W–44L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Connie Daniel
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Rene Griffin
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Dottie Boone
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karan Waddell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Anthony
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.