Teams

MAC Cousins Redux

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Kevin Cousins vs James Collins / Vincent Totaro6-2, 6-1
2024-08-24vs Battery Park Frenzel 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Cousins / Jeremy Calbreath vs Michael Bradner / Benton Boone7-6, 7-5
2024-08-24vs Westwood Dober/SnyderWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Cousins / Jeremy Calbreath vs Jeff Hause / Craig Dober6-2, 6-1
2024-08-17vs Belmont-StyerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Ken Lowenstein vs Spencer Carter / Richard Botha6-4, 6-4
2024-08-11vs ACAC JonesWon 10
W#2 DoublesErich Yost / Jason Yost vs Eddie Kim / Dave Booth6-4, 6-4
2024-07-27vs ACAC BryanWon 20
W#1 DoublesErich Yost / Jason Yost vs Jon Long-Leary / Rodney Orcutt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Roger Wisor vs Anthony Hunt / Roberto Sarmento6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jonathan McDorman
published
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.44
Roger Wisor
published
3.43
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Jason Yost
published
3.08
John Haggai
published
2.96
Ariel Mejia
published 3
2.94
Ken Lowenstein
published
2.85
Lance Pessarra
published
Kevin Cousins
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Wisor + Jeremy Calbreath5159% games+3.4% vs expected
Jason Yost + Erich Yost404 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Calbreath + Ariel Mejia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan McDorman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Roger Wisor
38W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
164W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jason Yost
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
John Haggai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Ariel Mejia
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Ken Lowenstein
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
Lance Pessarra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.