Teams

SFV-Toluca Lake Swans

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-04vs SFV-String Em AlongWon 20
W#1 DoublesLena Bouton / Debie Marsden vs Karen Gouveia / Kristy Swailes6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNickie Huai / Houry Nadjarian vs Carrie Gasper / Diane Quan6-3, 6-4
2021-11-13vs SFV-TeamCorbinLost 02
L#1 DoublesLena Bouton / MOLLIE CLIVER vs Jody Mischel / Bridget Thordarson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParisa Talebian / Nickie Huai vs Jill Koenig / Lisa Taylor6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-10-30vs SFV-2 Sets To LoveLost 02
L#2 DoublesAparna Bhargava / Debie Marsden vs Wyne Quinn / SANDI WISE2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHoury Nadjarian / Nickie Huai vs Sandy Hutchins / Juliet Walsh1-6, 0-6
2021-10-10vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 02
L#2 DoublesLena Bouton / Parisa Talebian vs Alexandra Pichugina / Anna Lyke7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebie Marsden / Aparna Bhargava vs Norizan Schmudde / Elena Saydah7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-26vs SFV-Warner StrikersWon 20
W#2 DoublesLena Bouton / Debie Marsden vs Kim Olds / Michele Venegas6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHoury Nadjarian / Nickie Huai vs Michelle Halpern / Madison Renner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-19vs SFV-Shot GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesNickie Huai / Houry Nadjarian vs Jackie Steffen / Elizabeth Hackelton6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2021-09-11vs SFV-Calabasas AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLena Bouton / MOLLIE CLIVER vs Mary Manix / Suzie Yamamoto6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sterling / Aparna Bhargava vs Corrine Weiner / Pauline McLean4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nickie Huai
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Debie Marsden
published 4
3.74
Parisa Talebian
published
3.74
Lena Bouton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Aubrey Karr
published 4
3.27
Aparna Bhargava
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Theresa Sterling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lena Bouton + Aubrey Karr4260% games+6.0% vs expected
Aubrey Karr + Nickie Huai3444% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nickie Huai
128W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Debie Marsden
17W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
Parisa Talebian
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Lena Bouton
81W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Aubrey Karr
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Aparna Bhargava
66W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.