Teams

BC-MCC/RachelAlexander

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-25vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Graham / Elizabeth Alexander vs Kris Rone / Heidi Weber1-6, 2-6
2023-06-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEthylene Ziegler / Frankie Read vs Liane Baumann / Katherine Nook3-6, 3-6
2023-06-04vs BC-ElDorado/JoGarrettLost 02
L#1 SinglesBre Kelleher vs Rachel Aelion-Moss2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristina Mohr / Ethylene Ziegler vs Stacy Tzur / Britta Hurst6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-13vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowLost 01
L#3 DoublesRachel Alexander / Kirsten Helvey vs Akiko Cohen / Tanya Drawer4-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs SoCal/Odanaka/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Layla Kiffin vs Evelyn Yanke / Kayla Yanke7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Twombley / Bre Kelleher vs Kim Graham / Kathleen Callahan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-30vs BC-WestEnd/DianeKaiserLost 02
L#2 DoublesTracy Jones / Ethylene Ziegler vs Suzanne Dunn / Mika Kaiser4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Alexander / Kimberly Graham vs Kelly Wong / Mary Foland4-6, 1-6
2023-04-15vs BC-AltaVista/JulieKanjanapangkaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Amy Karr vs Gia Bao Le / Jennifer Lee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrankie Read / Kirsten Helvey vs Sayaka Meguri / Sue Bingham6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
LAUREN JOHNSON
published
4.12
Bre Kelleher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4
3.81
Pamela Lopez
published
3.80
Stephanie Twombley
published
3.76
Beth Rager
published 4
3.76
Kelly Samimi
published
Amy Karr
published 4
3.75
Renee Tinker
published
3.72
Mariel VandenHengel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Linda Lai
published
3.69
3.65
Amanda Kresser
published 4
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.60
Layla Kiffin
published
3.50
Kristina Mohr
published
Dianne Wellbaum
published 3.5
Frankie Read
published 3.5
3.21
Kimberly Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
MaryAnn Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ethylene Ziegler + Kimberly Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LAUREN JOHNSON
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Bre Kelleher
67W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Kirsten Helvey
124W–71L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Stephanie Twombley
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beth Rager
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Kelly Samimi
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amy Karr
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Mariel VandenHengel
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Ethylene Ziegler
87W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Linda Lai
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Amanda Kresser
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Layla Kiffin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Dianne Wellbaum
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Frankie Read
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Graham
38W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.21
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
MaryAnn Burns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.