Teams

Davidson - Pinehurst Resort

2026 Sandhills Tri Level 40 & over · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-07vs Platt - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesVictoria Adkins / Lily Li vs Del Metcalf / Susi Tarvis2-6, 0-6
2026-06-07vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesShelly Manley / Renee Ference vs Lydia Apollo / Denise Bauer Frazier6-4, 6-2
2026-06-06vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Adkins / Mia Delk vs Sajata Strong / Caroline Bolduc6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-06vs Platt - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesRenee Ference / Sondra Montesi Yates vs Donna Hicks / Heather Evans1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Platt - Lawn and Tennis31931092
2Davidson - Pinehurst Resort317514106
3Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+0421022134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Liz Kasberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Tammy Batten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Adrianne Leinbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Victoria Adkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mia Delk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Sondra Montesi Yates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Shelly Manley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Renee Ference
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Delk + Victoria Adkins4250% games+4.6% vs expected
Adrianne Leinbach + Liz Kasberg231950% games+0.9% vs expected
Shelly Manley + Sondra Montesi Yates4747% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Liz Kasberg
187W–173L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Tammy Batten
52W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–225L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Victoria Adkins
41W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–304L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Sondra Montesi Yates
43W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Shelly Manley
42W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Renee Ference
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.