Teams

Zap

Combo · Combo 6.5W

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-08vs Dornhecker/BalderasLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonse Garcia / Luli Martinez vs Brandi Vincent / Troi Middleton1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJannice Rivero / Ashley Snook vs Lorie Balderas / Catherine Cuenca-Torres2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Schaefer / Tiffany Halsell vs Staci Wetz / Vanessa Arredondo1-6, 0-6
2026-09-03vs Briley/Ross 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCoCo Simpson / Jannice Rivero vs Christy Ross / Annette Schwartz6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Halsell / Ashley Snook vs Bea Carrasco / Melia Pullig1-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs ByrdLost 02
L#1 DoublesMegan Schaefer / Meaghan Davis vs Susan Looka / Sylvia Guadarrama0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuli Martinez / Jannice Rivero vs Cindy Byrd / Hayli Tomerlin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-13vs Briley/Ross 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Snook / Jannice Rivero vs Hallye Phillips / Maria Munoz4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonaLisa Fischer / Luli Martinez vs Kelcey Wells / Miranda Houser0-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs Dornhecker/BalderasLost 12
L#1 DoublesSylvia Zap / Megan Schaefer vs Brandi Vincent / Vanessa Arredondo0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLuli Martinez / CoCo Simpson vs Lori Dornhecker / Bridget Barbee2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJannice Rivero / Meaghan Davis vs Lorie Balderas / Theresa Welch6-0, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Combo 6.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Byrd3072654
2Dornhecker/Balderas2154970
3Briley/Ross 6.51254970
4Zap03181797

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
CoCo Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
MonaLisa Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Meaghan Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Tiffany Halsell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Monse Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Luli Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Ashley Snook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Sylvia Zap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MonaLisa Fischer + CoCo Simpson2348% games+9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
CoCo Simpson
23W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
MonaLisa Fischer
14W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Meaghan Davis
9W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Tiffany Halsell
8W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Monse Garcia
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Luli Martinez
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Ashley Snook
1W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Sylvia Zap
27W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.