Teams

Butcher

2022 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-20vs ArnoldLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaura Laabs / Stephanie Freeman vs Stephanie Burlace / Wendy Jones1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Walsh / Tjuana Jenkins vs Xenia Baranova / Marie Sokoloff1-6, 2-6
2022-11-20vs MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Butcher / Laura Laabs vs Elizabeth Jacobson / Tina Rohm2-6, 6-7
2022-11-19vs GowenWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Rossmark / Laura Laabs vs Sue King / Alexandria Arnold6-1, 6-3
2022-11-06vs ArnoldSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Murphy / Karen Yannone vs Nicole Gunhus / Melissa Donato7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesKristen Petre / Katie Mckinstry vs Jennifer Coady / Marie Sokoloff4-6, 3-6
2022-11-05vs MartinSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Shelley Williams vs Rebecca MacKowiak / Stephanie Mackowiak7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Bray / Tjuana Jenkins vs Dale Clark / Lisa Mulholland2-6, 3-6
2022-10-29vs ArnoldWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Stephanie Murphy vs Mary Arnold / Belinda McLean6-4, 6-3
2022-10-23vs MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Stephanie Freeman vs Kimberly Walko / Stephanie Mackowiak3-6, 3-6
2022-10-16vs ArnoldLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Petre / Gia Jang vs Melissa Wanner / Jennifer Coady4-6, 6-7
2022-10-09vs MartinWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Laabs / Karen Yannone vs Kimberly Walko / Elizabeth Jacobson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Audrey Gunther
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Joi Remoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Tara Ritter
published
3.65
Sally Christie
published
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
published
3.50
Sara Wagner
published
3.48
Gia Jang
published 3.5
3.34
Lisa Walsh
published
3.32
Elizabeth Iliff
published 3.5
3.31
Karen Yannone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Laura Laabs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Cindy Keegan
published 3.5
3.05
Kristen Petre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Alexandra Bray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Tjuana Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jessica Butcher
published
Marla Lusby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Bray + Kristen Petre6353% gamesnot enough data
Audrey Gunther + Kristen Petre213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Petre + Laura Laabs123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Laabs + Lisa Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Gunther
172W–114L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Joi Remoll
144W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Tara Ritter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Sally Christie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sara Wagner
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Gia Jang
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lisa Walsh
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Elizabeth Iliff
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Karen Yannone
178W–151L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Laura Laabs
177W–206L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cindy Keegan
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Kristen Petre
69W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Alexandra Bray
55W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Tjuana Jenkins
29W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Jessica Butcher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marla Lusby
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.