Teams

Avila Aces - I. Peterson

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-06vs PC Overserved - C. EicholtzLost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Wilson / Lina Dey vs Kristen Wulbern / Anderson Sasso5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Badyna vs Jody Jotham6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesFrances Marton / Ivy Peterson vs Laurie Daigle / Ashley Terry4-6, 5-7
2025-05-23vs Arbor Greene Emeralds - S. FrisinaLost 12
W#1 DoublesLina Dey / Rachel Badyna vs Devon Connell / Lisa Lalis6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesIvy Peterson vs Cheri Snyder7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSally Sierra / Frances Marton vs VEENA RAMESH / Stacy Leatherman3-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs RH Sugar and Slice - C. CoyleLost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Badyna vs Pojjamarn Simos3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Badyna / Lina Dey vs Kelley Sadlowski / Sarah Lindbeck6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVanessa Bergin vs Molly James6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIvy Peterson / Sally Sierra vs Kristen Richards / Belem Schmidt6-0, 6-3
2025-05-02vs Cheval - J. HurleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesVanessa Bergin / Monica Illas vs LAURA Martin Santana / Dawn Kay7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Badyna / Kaukeb Malik vs Krystal Adrian / Diana Castellanos4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Rachel Badyna
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Lina Dey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Monica Illas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Vanessa Bergin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Tara O'Grady
published
2.06
Kaukeb Malik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Frances Marton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Ivy Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Dey + Rachel Badyna8171% games+22.1% vs expected
Ivy Peterson + Frances Marton2738% games−9.9% vs expected
Ivy Peterson + Kaukeb Malik123 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Badyna + Kaukeb Malik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Badyna
24W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Lina Dey
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Monica Illas
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Vanessa Bergin
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Tara O'Grady
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Kaukeb Malik
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Frances Marton
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Ivy Peterson
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.