Teams

Abraham 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesLibby Ramsey / Palmar Ortmann vs Mary Beth Hartman / Natalie Harris7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Dover / Kara Jacobs vs Jennifer Dymek / Deanna Rouse6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Missy Fields vs Donna Warrick / Karen Robinson6-1, 7-5
W#1 DoublesPalmar Ortmann / Angela McGinn vs Leslie Marus / Andrea Sweat5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Dover / Kara Jacobs vs Casey Emmendorfer / Shawn McFarlin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Harlan / Jenny Kemp vs Teresa Cruz / Susan Parsons6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJenny Kemp / Angela McGinn vs Christina Mohorn / Jeanie Reynolds3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKara Jacobs / Julie Pyrtle vs Jen Berlin / Allison Pool6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Cameron Wannamaker vs Lucy Callahan / Britt Molitoris7-5, 6-0
2026-08-03vs Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Parr / Claire Driscoll vs Toni Lewis / Catherine Tanner7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Anna Magrini vs Erin Huffines / Martha Fogleman7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Cooke / Tracy Harlan vs Jill Fritz / Annie Chapman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 7.5 40 & Over Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Heather Parr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Leigh Abraham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Julie Pyrtle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Julie Dover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Tracy Harlan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Angela McGinn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Libby Ramsey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Missy Fields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Cameron Wannamaker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Jenny Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Palmar Ortmann
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Kara Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Claire Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Anna Magrini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Claire Driscoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Pyrtle + Libby Ramsey3262% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Harlan + Heather Parr224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Parr + Libby Ramsey314 matchesnot enough data
Cameron Wannamaker + Julie Dover213 matchesnot enough data
Angela McGinn + Julie Pyrtle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Parr
39W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Leigh Abraham
29W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
Julie Pyrtle
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Tracy Harlan
23W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Angela McGinn
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Libby Ramsey
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Missy Fields
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jenny Kemp
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Palmar Ortmann
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Claire Cooke
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Anna Magrini
2W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.