Teams

Fulco -Gooszen /40/6.5/WCN/STCC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-22vs Matheny/40/6.5/WCN/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Gooszen / Sarah Hatfield vs Darlene Dean / Lila Knicely6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKyla Fulco / Stacey Cormier vs Courtney Matheny / Beth Hopkins7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bass / Lauren Hubble vs Cindy Shaw / Heidi Kallenberg6-1, 6-0
2025-10-15vs Gordon/40/6.5/WCN/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Stage / Laura Gooszen vs Jenifer Gordon / Lauren Patton6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Octavi / Tiffany Bell vs Jenny Rodgers / Tracy Jones0-6, 0-6
2025-10-08vs Hood/40/6.5/WCN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Bass / Jennifer Octavi vs Jodi Marvin / April Walker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Turner / Lauren Hubble vs JoAnna B Haynes / Barri Copete6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Gooszen / Stacey Cormier vs Jill Chanler / Lisa Davis6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Angelo/40/6.5/WCN/QTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKyla Fulco / Jennifer Octavi vs Toni Goodin / Tammy Rhodes6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Gooszen / Christina Stage vs Nong Boutaloth / Parisa Zamani3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Cormier / Lauren Hubble vs Jacqueline Hardison / Holli Griffin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-01vs Cummer/40/6.5/WCN/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyla Fulco / Jennifer Octavi vs Marie Israel / Becky Wilson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Gooszen / Sarah Hatfield vs Caroline Jeter / Kendra Wagnon6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Stage / Lauren Hubble vs Madeline Cummer / Betsy Sample6-3, 6-3
2025-09-17vs Ferry-Nelson/40/6.5/WCN/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Marlar / Christina Stage vs Lynn Ferry-Nelson / Rachael Deere3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Bass / Lauren Hubble vs Ann Sellers / Roxanne Voigt4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Turner / Tiffany Bell vs Vanessa Hernandez / Lyndsey Chandler2-6, 6-7
2025-09-03vs Matheny/40/6.5/WCN/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Doughty / Sarah Hatfield vs Courtney Matheny / Rhonda Terracciano6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKyla Fulco / Jennifer Octavi vs Mary Jayroe / Lila Knicely7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bass / Christina Stage vs Kathy Barlow / Beth Hopkins6-4, 6-4
2025-08-27vs Gordon/40/6.5/WCN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyla Fulco / Jennifer Octavi vs Emily Douglas / Brooke Romero6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Doughty / Lauren Hubble vs Christy Gonzalez / Stephanie Risher6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Gooszen / Christina Stage vs Aubree Bunyard / Tracy Jones7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Sara Doughty
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.57
Kyla Fulco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alison Marlar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Laura Gooszen
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
3.19
Stephanie Bass
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Sarah Hatfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Christina Stage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Tiffany Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Lauren Hubble
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.82
Jennifer Octavi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Stacey Cormier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Hatfield + Laura Gooszen4259% games+17.6% vs expected
Lauren Hubble + Jennifer Octavi5158% games+8.7% vs expected
Kyla Fulco + Sara Doughty5557% games−0.5% vs expected
Kyla Fulco + Laura Gooszen72242% games−2.8% vs expected
Stephanie Bass + Laura Gooszen2442% games−3.1% vs expected
Stacey Cormier + Christina Stage3257% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Bass + Kyla Fulco314 matchesnot enough data
Kyla Fulco + Jennifer Octavi404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Doughty
66W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kyla Fulco
54W–63L career · 9 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Alison Marlar
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Gooszen
48W–95L career · 13 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Stephanie Bass
19W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Sarah Hatfield
33W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Christina Stage
40W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Tiffany Bell
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Lauren Hubble
28W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Jennifer Octavi
28W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Stacey Cormier
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.