Teams

Avalon Ghita Men

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.61 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-02vs WOCC Tri-Harders (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Andrew Zima vs John Chenault V / James Dunton2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAlex Neuwelt / Lyman Brown vs Ryan Bardaro / Dylan Brod7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAndrei Fulga / Gabriel Ghita vs K C Funk / Brian Nalls6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesIstvan Godri Martis / Steven Edlavitch vs David Robinson / Jeremy Calbreath2-6, 1-6
2022-10-12vs Wyndham Warriors HouffWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Gabriel Ghita vs Doug Blouch / Bert Foreman7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Chris Giacchi vs STEVEN ROBERTS / Jay Harter6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesVikram Nagulan / Gabriel Ghita vs Casey Hill / Brian Hauk6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-28vs Avalon LuchsingerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Chris Giacchi vs Kristopher Johnson / Nicholas Grainger2-6, 2-6
2022-09-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesLyman Brown / John Foust vs Matthew Cline / Dutch Jones6-3, 6-3
2022-09-08Won 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Zima / Lyman Brown vs Tanner Bonovitch / Jayadheer Baddam6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Radu Siminiceanu vs James Newton / Anthony Hayden6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
John Foust
published
4.05
Alex Neuwelt
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 4.5
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.54
Lyman Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Gabriel Ghita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Andrei Fulga
published 3.5
3.17
Vikram Nagulan
published
3.03
Mark Schultz
published
2.86
Gregory Franklin
published 3
2.65
Laurent Beausergent
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Foust
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alex Neuwelt
260W–119L career · 12 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Lyman Brown
183W–205L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
137W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Andrei Fulga
5W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Vikram Nagulan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Mark Schultz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Gregory Franklin
21W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Istvan Godri Martis
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Laurent Beausergent
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.