Teams

D.McNeill/TMuncie 55+

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-29vs R.GoldbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Joseph Smith vs Greg Kasse / John Winn7-5, 6-3
2023-04-13vs J.BRUCKELSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoseph Smith / David McNeill vs John Bruckel / Michael Hamlett2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Tim Lyon vs Joey Jacobs / Alan Crews4-6, 1-6
2023-03-30vs B.FRANCISSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTim Lyon / David McNeill vs Bob Brooks / Bill Francis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLarry Essary / Mark Zimmerman vs Chip Payne / Keith Satisky3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-23vs M.Unruh 55+Split 11
L#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Todd Muncie vs Daniel Knox / Miguel Materin0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Mark Zimmerman vs David Steele / Steve Schinkel6-2, 6-2
2023-03-16vs J.SageLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Joseph Smith vs Wally Hinkleman / Don Pittman6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Larry Essary vs Terence McKee / Jason Sage4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Lyon / Ben Micham vs Sean Ahr / Patrick Wood3-6, 4-6
2023-03-09vs R.BoyleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLarry Essary / John Dunn vs Kenneth Gillespie / Craig Leese6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid McNeill / Todd Muncie vs Jay Leonard / Eric Glickstein4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Tim Lyon vs Andrew May / Kevin Tombs4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Larry Essary
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Jeff Chaffin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
David McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.14
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.11
Ben Micham
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David McNeill + Larry Essary81146% games−9.1% vs expected
Jeff Chaffin + Larry Essary61145% games−11.8% vs expected
David McNeill + Jeff Chaffin6651% gamesnot enough data
Ben Micham + Larry Essary044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Larry Essary
109W–138L career · 5 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Jeff Chaffin
77W–121L career · 2 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
David McNeill
103W–135L career · 6 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
Mark Zimmerman
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Ben Micham
70W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.