Teams

Jordan

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 65 & Over Day · Adult 65 & Over Day Women 7.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Engler / Deborah Dettmer vs Sue Lin Chong / Nancy Heinold7-6, 4-4
2021-06-24vs KnouseLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Linda Webb vs Shelly Frederick / Barbara Wertman2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJean Flack / Patricia Knapp vs Carole Shapiro / Nancy Knouse2-6, 6-7
2021-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesJean Flack / Vera Rudegeair vs Barb McClanahan / Cynthia Hood6-1, 6-2
2021-06-11vs KnouseLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Engler / Karen Moore vs Nancy Knouse / Carole Shapiro3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Diana Chen vs Cynthia Hood / Kristina Shelor4-6, 5-5
2021-06-03vs KnouseLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Jean Flack vs Arlene Kitahara / Shelly Frederick3-6, 4-5
2021-05-26vs Leitzer-KerrLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Greenfield / Diana Engler vs Connie Bird / Thelma Leitzer-Kerr5-7, 2-6
2021-05-13vs KnouseWon 10
W#3 DoublesSally Barkley / Diana Engler vs Susan Reichard / Helen Wohnsigl2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & Over Day Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jean Flack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Diana Engler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Deborah Dettmer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Michele Jordan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Engler + Deborah Dettmer5546% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Dettmer + Jean Flack3650% gamesnot enough data
Diana Engler + Jean Flack3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jean Flack
59W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Diana Engler
99W–133L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Deborah Dettmer
167W–205L career · 4 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Michele Jordan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.