Teams

Davis K - Dbls 3.0W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.0 Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.0 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Angela Greene
published 3
2.95
Teresa Sagraves
published
2.90
Julia Brodeur
published
2.85
Cheryl Ryding
published 3
2.56
Meredith Lantz
published
2.54
Susan Brodeur
published
2.50
Tara Frame
published
Meredith Heberle
published
Spring Walsh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angela Greene
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
Teresa Sagraves
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Julia Brodeur
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Cheryl Ryding
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Meredith Lantz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Susan Brodeur
2W–20L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Tara Frame
4W–31L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Meredith Heberle
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Spring Walsh
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.